The Demand for Energy and Steel

There’s a good story going on in Lorain, Ohio, a steel town that has seen ups and downs. Thanks to the surge in production of energy from shale in neighboring Pennsylvania, the current trend is decidedly up.

John Wilkinson, who manages U.S. Steel’s Lorain tubular operations facility that makes steel pipe, says good years (2007-08) were followed by the economic downturn in 2009. Layoffs were ordered. Shale has played a big role in turning things around, building demand for steel products including casings to line wells and extraction tubing. Wilkinson:

“Now with the upturn in the economy, the things we’re seeing from the Marcellus Shale and the increase in production, we’ve had the opportunity to recall almost all of those people and actually hire an additional 300 people in the last 18 months.”

Check out this video for a sense of the hope and opportunity that’s come to Lorain through the shale/hydraulic fracturing revolution:

It’s not just one community or one company. Shale plays around the country are generating energy, jobs and economic growth.

View the original article here

E15: A Fuel Before Its Time

E15 – gasoline containing 15 percent ethanol that has EPA approval  – is one of those ideas that looks good on paper but seems headed for problems in the real world. API’s Bob Greco, director for downstream and industry operations, outlined some of them for reporters during a conference call:

Testing so far shows the higher concentration of ethanol would not be fully compatible with much of the dispensing and storage equipment the nation’s gas stations. A recent API review estimated half of the existing retail outlet equipment isn’t E15 compatible.As a result, there could be damage to equipment, safety problems and potential environmental concerns at gas stations.Difficulties with E15 getting into the market could erode public support for the nation’s renewable fuels program.Refiners could face problems in the future, caught between satisfying federal requirements for blended fuels and the lack of a retail market for those fuels.

Greco said EPA’s E15 approval isn’t a mandate to sell and that the timing of its emergence into the marketplace will depend on clearing hurdles in individual states. Still, the concern is that E15 wasn’t thoroughly evaluated before it got EPA approval.

“The availability of biofuels for blending in gasoline is a good thing because of its favorable octane, and the industry supports a realistic and workable Renewable Fuels Standard.  In fact, more than 90 percent of all gasoline sold in the country has a 10 percent blend of ethanol.  But EPA has not done its homework before introducing E15 to America.  The Agency’s enthusiasm for E15 has clouded its judgment and led to approval of a fuel before adequate study has been done.”

Compatibility issues loom large, Greco said. “Even with vehicles the EPA says are compatible, automakers disagree,” he said. Last summer U.S. Rep. James Sensenbrenner of Wisconsin forwarded letters from car companies to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson that outline their E15 concerns. A sampling:

Ford: “Ford does not support the introduction of E15 into the marketplace for the legacy fleet. … Fuel not approved in the owner’s manual is considered misfueling and any damage resulting from misfueling is not covered by the warranty.”

Chrysler: “We are not confident that our vehicles will not be damaged from the use of E15. … The warranty information provided to our customers specifically notes that use of the blends beyond E10 will void the warranty.”

Honda: “Vehicle engines were not designed or built to accommodate the higher concentrations of ethanol.  … There appears to be the potential for engine failure.”

Ultimately, Greco said, consumers might become confused and ultimately could bear higher costs:

“Without a market for the higher ethanol blends, Congress’ biofuels mandate could result in higher compliance costs or production constraints that could place upward pressure on gasoline prices for consumers.”

One questioner asked whether NASCAR’s use of higher-ethanol fuel suggests E15 concerns are overstated. “I don’t know about you,” Greco said, “but I don’t drive a race car.”

View the original article here

Facts, Not Excuses, Should Guide Decision on Re-Routed Keystone XL

It’s good to hear that TransCanada has submitted its new application for a presidential permit to build the Keystone XL pipeline. The application comes just weeks after the Nebraska legislature approved a bill to move forward with a new route in that state that avoids the sensitive Sand Hills region.

Even better news would be that the White House, after a long list of excuses that prevented timely approval of the project, is now ready to give the go-ahead – dropping a position that a Washington Post editorial said has “little rational basis.” That analysis is reinforced not only by public opinion, but also by economic and environmental data. For example:

Americans support construction of the Keystone XL by nearly a 2-1 margin, according to a recent Gallup poll.A bipartisan, veto-proof majority in the U.S. House of Representatives recently voted to support construction of Keystone XL, the fifth time the House has backed the project. In March, 56 U.S. senators voted in favor of building the Keystone XL.More than 80 percent of Americans believe U.S. policies should support the use of oil from Canada’s oil sands.According to the U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, pipelines are the “safest and most-effective” way of transporting oil and natural gas. In addition, a comprehensive environmental assessment from the federal government concluded that the Keystone XL would have only “limited” impacts and be the safest pipeline ever constructed under current regulations.With unemployment still above 8 percent nationwide, the Keystone XL not only would create thousands of new jobs but also would help preserve jobs at U.S. refineries and production sites.While there are many factors that affect the price of gasoline families use to fill up their tanks, approving the Keystone XL would send a strong market signal that more supply is on the way, helping put downward pressure on the global price of crude oil, which accounts for 76 percent of the price paid at the pump. The pipeline could bring upwards of 830,000 barrels per day of Canadian oil from Alberta to U.S. refineries, with approximately 25 percent of the pipeline’s capacity used to deliver oil from North Dakota and Montana.

The application also comes as a new poll finds that Canadians support increased oil sands development by about a 2-1 margin. Among all provinces, the lowest level of support was in Quebec, where a clear majority – 55 percent – still supports development.

API Executive Vice President Marty Durbin said it’s time to approve the Keystone XL:

“The earth hasn’t moved, the geology hasn’t changed, the information remains the same, so there should be no reason for a re-review of KXL. The pipeline will be state of the art and has already been thoroughly examined for more than three years, including three environmental assessments. … The president should take this opportunity to approve the entire pipeline to demonstrate he is serious about an ‘all the above’ energy strategy. There is no legitimate reason for delaying this project any further. … We urge President Obama to support this project that will make us more energy secure.”

View the original article here

May 5, Looking for Work

by Randy Right
(Alabama,Monore)

High my name is Randy Right ,an i am looking for a job on a oilrig offshore or land. jedrich2001@yahoo.com

View the original article here

‘If I Wanted America to Fail …’

Here’s an abbreviated version of a video by Free Market America on administration policies that the group says are undermining domestic energy production, economic growth, jobs and America’s overall prosperity.  Of course, the mention of energy caught our ear. Take a look:

A longer version has gone viral, with more than 1.2 million views. Both versions make valid points about the need for abundant, affordable energy and the threat to America’s economy when that is denied – as well as the drag on jobs and growth posed by unnecessary regulation.

“If I wanted America to fail …” is a rhetorical device, of course. But it underscores ways America’s economic potential may be undercut by well-intentioned activism and political agendas.

View the original article here

Hey, Jay Carney, You Forgot Something!

POLITICO Pro Energy reports that while talking to reporters about crucifixion comments by EPA’s Region 6 administrator, White House spokesman Jay Carney assured that the administration has “a commitment to ensure natural gas is an essential part of our future.”

Hold on. Something missing here … oil!

Sure, natural gas is an essential part of our future. But Carney must’ve had the Roman legions on his mind when he neglected to mention oil as equally important.  We’ll remind him:

Actually, by usage, oil is the most essential piece of America’s energy portfolio, supplying about 37 percent of our energy right now, according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA). Natural gas is second at about 25 percent.Oil will be America’s energy of the future, too. EIA says it will supply about 35 percent of our energy in 2035 (natural gas still second at 25 percent).

All energy sources are important now and in the future -- we’ll need a true all-of-the-above strategy. Any discussion of America’s energy policy needs to start with America’s energy reality, and that needs to start with oil.  While we would certainly welcome an actual commitment to natural gas, the Administration also needs to be committed to securing our liquid fuel needs, and we can do it, we are not energy poor, we have the resources and the technology to develop them safely.  This is what energy progress looks like:

View the original article here

Our Energy and Economic Crossroads

During a recent conference call with reporters API Chief Economist John Felmy said the country is at a “crossroads of energy and economic policy.” That’s quite a crossroads. Chad Moutray, chief economist at the National Association of Manufacturers, pointed out that manufacturing has added 462,000 net new jobs since 2010, and that continued growth hinges on energy and regulatory policy. So, where do we stand?

The administration’s energy policy is a muddle, as IPAA President and CEO Barry Russell argues in this Roll Call piece:

“Obama calls to expedite infrastructure projects, but in the wake of rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline. Obama claims increased oil and natural gas production on his watch, but then follows up with accusations that oil companies are profiting at the expense of the American people. Obama repeatedly calls for an ‘all of the above’ energy strategy, but then singles out the oil and natural gas industry for new regulations and targeted tax attacks.”

OK. Not so great. How about regulatory policy?

Last week’s new EPA rule on emissions from oil and natural gas development had positive elements – for example, delaying industry compliance with some costly and labor-intensive requirements until 2015. Still, overall, the administration’s regulatory approach hasn’t been encouraging, chiefly seen in policies that limit access to federal areas onshore and offshore.

Fuel Fix reports that deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico is getting busier, but take a look at the actual numbers:

“The government awarded 163 deep-water drilling permits for the Gulf in 2009. The number dropped to 74 in 2010, but has climbed since then to 79 in 2011 and 44 through March of this year.”

And:

“[Analyst Robert] Kessler also noted that the time required for approval of exploration and development plans is still 150 days on average, compared to 54 days before the moratorium, another indicator of the added expense and challenge since the spill.”

Felmy cautioned that added regulatory layers “can slow development” of America’s vast energy resources. “Look at the totality of all EPA rules,” he said. “It really is an onslaught.” Moutray said the economic recovery is tenuous, and that the manufacturing sector is looking for broad energy options and sensible, stable policy from government:

“Energy is critical. We need affordable sources of energy to remain competitive globally. … We need an all-of-the-above approach that doesn’t pick winners and losers, that stresses the ‘all’ and not just favored projects. … We must have as many tools as possible for energy.”

Energy is the linchpin for economic growth – especially in the manufacturing sector. Developing energy from shale in Pennsylvania, North Dakota and Texas has produced jobs and a rising economic tide capable of lifting state and regional economies. Ohio and other states are poised to benefit as well.

The question is whether Washington will allow that kind of activity to go forward, or will it sap the momentum with red-tape delays and new layers of restrictive regulation, possibly duplicating effective state regulatory efforts? Will the administration continue to threaten higher taxes on an industry that pays its fair share already and is ready to do much more on energy and jobs? Will it get serious about domestic oil production, onshore and offshore, and end its obstruction of the Keystone XL pipeline?

As Felmy noted, these are components of an energy strategy that could see the United States reach energy self-sufficiency through North American resources in just 12 years.

Good questions for consideration at the crossroads.

View the original article here