Monday, July 22, 2013

Lundin: North Sea Oil Find Luno II May Hold 160M Barrels

OSLO - Swedish oil company Lundin Petroleum AB estimated that its Luno II discovery off Norway could yield as much as 160 million barrels, the latest in a string of finds that have revived interest in the North Sea.

It was the first indication of the size of the find, and the market was slightly disappointed.

Lundin said it expects the southern part of Luno II to contain between 25 million and 120 million barrels of oil equivalent. Another section to the north could produce between 10 million and 40 million barrels, the company said.

Lundin shares fell 2.2% to trade at SEK152.00 after the announcement, reflecting both uncertainty about the exact size of Luno II and the announcement Sunday of an increase in oil company taxes in Norway.

Luno II is located in a geological formation in the middle of the North Sea called the Utsira High. This is where Lundin discovered the Edvard Grieg in 2007 and the Johan Sverdrup in 2010, both significant finds.

"We are pleased to announce another significant discovery in the Utsira High region, which in terms of size and location is likely to be commercial," said Lundin chief executive Ashley Heppenstall.

Lundin's recent success on the Utsira High has contributed to renewed interest in the North Sea, where most companies thought there was nothing left to find after four decades of oil activity.

Statoil recently reported the discovery of between 40 million and 150 million high-value barrels near Gullfaks, a nearly depleted field in the northern North Sea where production began in the mid-80s.

Mr. Heppenstall said the company continues to explore Utsira High and said he was optimistic about further discoveries.

Lundin is the operator of production license 359 where Luno II was found, with a 40% ownership stake. Statoil ASA and Premier Oil Plc each have a 30% stake in the field.

Copyright (c) 2013 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Hess Continues Push for Board Nominees in Proxy Fight

Hess Corp. stepped up an ongoing push for its director nominees Monday after two proxy advisory firms last week recommended shareholders back the board slate put forth by dissident holder Elliott Management Corp.

Hess's five director nominees released a letter to shareholders defending their role, while Hess separately accused proxy advisory firm Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. of having an "institutional bias toward activist shareholders," an allegation the firm denied.

The proxy battle between the oil company and Elliott, a hedge fund that owns about 4.52% of Hess's shares, has gone on for months.

Elliott has argued Hess's board has sat by, allowing management to pursue costly and ineffective strategies that have eroded the company's value. Meanwhile, Hess has said it is on track to transform itself into a more focused exploration and production company, and Elliott is pursuing a destructive and flawed plan to break up the company.

Hess shareholders will vote on the board composition at the annual meeting May 16 in Houston.

In Monday's letter, the Hess nominees solicited the support of shareholders, saying Elliott's characterization that Hess's board members are required to support the company's strategic plan as a precondition for serving on the board "is simply false."

In response, Elliott Management called Hess's plea "desperate," adding, "rather than address the real operational and governance issues that have plagued the company for nearly two decades, Hess has decided to attack the independent shareholder advisory services."

Meanwhile, Hess said ISS has "adopted a pervasive policy of bias in favor of the activist," citing a recent New York Times survey that shows the advisory firm has backed the insurgent slate in 73% of cases so far in 2013.

Hess cited prior proxy contests in which ISS has backed the insurgent slate, including battles between AOL Inc. and Starboard Value LP, Motorola Solutions Inc. and Carl Icahn, Actelion Ltd. and Elliott, and Target Corp. and Pershing Square Capital Management.

ISS disputed the charge, saying it has recommended shareholders vote in favor of management nominees in 45% of cases since 2011 and only fully backed a board slate from a dissident shareholder in 12% of circumstances.

In its report last week, ISS cited the company's "significant underperformance," and what it said are signs that the board's "new-found attentiveness to the business is a response to the proxy contest," adding Hess's transformation appears to have occurred only on the surface and a slate of board members already aligned with the company's management isn't in the best position to oversee the company.

Two other proxy firms have weighed in. Glass Lewis & Co. on Wednesday sided with the dissidents, concluding that while the shift toward becoming a pure exploration and production company may be the right one, "we find little cause to suggest that the current board is best suited to oversee that change."

Egan-Jones Proxy Services, however, said Hess's efforts at transformation are translating into lower spending and driving production growth, and the dissidents haven't offered a persuasive strategy.

Copyright (c) 2013 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Statoil: Proposed Tax Change Threat to Projects

Statoil has warned that a proposed change to tax breaks for investors on the Norwegian Continental Shelf threatens the attractiveness of future projects.

Norway is proposing to reduce the uplift in its petroleum tax system from 7.5 percent to 5.5 percent, which according to a Statoil statement Monday would reduce tax deductions on NCS projects by $38 million for every $1 billion invested.

Statoil said that a predictable and stable fiscal framework is important to secure the attractiveness of continued investment in the NCS.

"The proposed change in the Norwegian petroleum tax reduces the attractiveness of future projects, particularly marginal fields, and raises questions regarding the predictability and stability of the fiscal framework for long-term investments on the Norwegian continental shelf," Statoil CFO Torgrim Reitan said in a statement.

The proposed change is to be included in Norway's Revised National Budget 2013, which will be announced Tuesday.

The reduction in the uplift was designed to bring offshore investment in line with onshore investment in the country, an aide to Norway's Minister of Petroleum and Energy, Ola Borten Moe, currently attending the Offshore Technology Conference show in Houston, told Rigzone Monday.

The Norwegian government has also proposed a transition rule for projects where the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy has received a plan for development and operation (PDO), or a plan for installation and operation (PIO), prior to May 5. For investments covered by this transition rule, the current uplift of 7.5 percent will still apply.

A former engineer, Jon is an award-winning editor who has covered the technology, engineering and energy sectors since the mid-1990s. Email Jon at jmainwaring@rigzone.com.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Drilling Report, May 5

Click HERE to read a PDF of the May 5 Tyler Morning Telegraph Drilling Report

The drilling report was produced with data from the Texas Railroad Commission, from April 21 to April 27. The following counties were searched: Anderson, Angelina, Camp, Cass, Cherokee, Dallas, Ellis, Freestone, Gregg, Harrison, Henderson, Houston, Kaufman, Leon, Limestone, Marion, Nacogdoches, Navarro, Panola, Rains, Robertson, Rusk, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith, Upshur, Van Zandt and Wood. For information aboutthe drilling report contact Business Editor Casey Murphy at cmurphy@tylerpaper.com or 903-596-6289.


View the original article here

ENI Finds Gas Onshore Pakistan

Italy's ENI reported Monday that it has made a new gas discovery on the Sukhpur Block, located in the Kirthar Foldbelt onshore Pakistan.

ENI said its Lundali-1 NFW exploration well was drilled to a total depth of 8,727 feet and encountered gas-bearing sands in the Paleocene sequence. During production testing the well produced gas that flowed up to a rate of 33 million cubic feet per day.

ENI added that the new discovery marks "another success" in its near field exploration strategy in the country. The additional production at Lundali will allow the optimization of the existing Eni's infrastructure including the Bhit gas processing facility located some 18 miles to the west of the block. The company also said the result confirms the significant exploration potential of the Sukhpur Block where it plans to drill another exploration well within next twelve months.

ENI's joint venture partners in the Sukhpur Block included PPL, with a 30-percent interest, and KUFPEC, which has a 25-percent stake.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Government Could Broaden Definition of State-Owned Companies

OTTAWA - The federal government is poised to pass Investment Canada amendments that will broaden its definition of "state-owned enterprises" and could subject SOEs' acquisitions of minority stakes in Canadian companies to investment reviews to determine whether they represent a net benefit to Canada.

The measures are contained in a budget omnibus bill, tabled by Minister Jim Flaherty last week, and expected to be passed into law before the Commons recesses for the summer next month.

In a written analysis, lawyers at Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP say the amendments will add considerable uncertainty to the foreign investment review process for companies that have close ties to foreign governments--even if they are not state-owned--and go beyond what Ottawa promised last December when it first announced heightened foreign-investment scrutiny for state-owned enterprises.

The budget bill "introduces a new level of uncertainty into the federal government's treatment of proposed investments by SOEs which was not anticipated in December 2012," the Osler lawyers write.

Osler partner Shuli Rodal said the proposed amendments remove "safe harbor" assurances that allow foreign companies to acquire less than one-third of voting shares, or a minority interest in a trust, partnership or joint venture, without triggering Investment Canada review. Companies in the cultural sector already have to demonstrate that they are not gaining de facto control through the purchase of minority shares, and now state-owned enterprises will face that same hurdle, Ms. Rodal said in an interview.

At the same time, Ottawa is giving itself broad discretion to decide who is state controlled.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced late last year that Ottawa would not allow additional foreign-government investment in the oil sands, even as he allowed CNOOC Ltd.'s C$15.3 billion acquisition of Calgary-based Nexen Inc. and a C$6 billion takeover of natural gas-rich Progress Energy by Malaysia's Petronas. While insisting Ottawa welcomes investment by state-owned enterprises elsewhere in the Canadian economy, the prime minister signaled a clear preference for their acquisition of minority stakes and said Ottawa would assess whether an investment would leave the Canadian firm under the influence of a foreign government, even if it did not involve a majority interest.

Prior to the Nexen decision, the investment banking community expected a wave of new deals involving state-owned enterprises in Canada, but very few have materialized.

Many critics, including the opposition New Democrats, urged Ottawa to clarify Investment Canada rules so that potential foreign investors would know what hurdles they faced before they attempt to do business in Canada. But the December policy announcement and proposed Investment Canada amendments create more, not less, ministerial discretion and greater uncertainty.

"Until somebody tests it, we won't know for sure how it will be applied," said Paul Boothe, a University of Western Ontario business professor and former senior official at Industry Canada. "So someone who wants to do their deal and thinks they're in good shape will test this, and if it works, then we'll have a little more evidence no how this is being applied. But right now, people are going to be unsure about it."

In determining with an investment by a foreign company should be reviewed under SOE guidelines, the minister can look at whether it has minority government investment, commercial relationships with foreign governments or significant relationships with officials within government. So for example, Brazil's Vale SA is a publicly traded company but the Brazilian government exercises considerable influence and holds a "golden share," so Vale could be considered a state-owned enterprise under the new Investment Canada rules.

Copyright (c) 2013 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Statoil: Proposed Tax Change Threat to Projects

Statoil has warned that a proposed change to tax breaks for investors on the Norwegian Continental Shelf threatens the attractiveness of future projects.

Norway is proposing to reduce the uplift in its petroleum tax system from 7.5 percent to 5.5 percent, which according to a Statoil statement Monday would reduce tax deductions on NCS projects by $38 million for every $1 billion invested.

Statoil said that a predictable and stable fiscal framework is important to secure the attractiveness of continued investment in the NCS.

"The proposed change in the Norwegian petroleum tax reduces the attractiveness of future projects, particularly marginal fields, and raises questions regarding the predictability and stability of the fiscal framework for long-term investments on the Norwegian continental shelf," Statoil CFO Torgrim Reitan said in a statement.

The proposed change is to be included in Norway's Revised National Budget 2013, which will be announced Tuesday.

The reduction in the uplift was designed to bring offshore investment in line with onshore investment in the country, an aide to Norway's Minister of Petroleum and Energy, Ola Borten Moe, currently attending the Offshore Technology Conference show in Houston, told Rigzone Monday.

The Norwegian government has also proposed a transition rule for projects where the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy has received a plan for development and operation (PDO), or a plan for installation and operation (PIO), prior to May 5. For investments covered by this transition rule, the current uplift of 7.5 percent will still apply.

A former engineer, Jon is an award-winning editor who has covered the technology, engineering and energy sectors since the mid-1990s. Email Jon at jmainwaring@rigzone.com.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Karoon Finds Oil Offshore Brazil, Shares Jump

SYDNEY - Karoon Gas Australia Ltd. has made its second significant oil discovery offshore Brazil, sending its shares soaring as much as 28% Monday and increasing the possibility of finding another partner to share development costs.

The Australian company has now discovered oil in two out of three wells drilled in the Santos Basin, located south of Rio de Janeiro, with joint venture partner Pacific Rubiales Energy Corp. Karoon owns 65% of the venture and analysts expect it sell more of its interest if there's enough oil to underpin a multibillion dollar development.

Karoon said the Bilby-1 well discovered oil across a 200-meter gross column, although more work needs to be done to determine the size of the find and whether it can be developed commercially.

The rise in Karoon's stock lifted the company's value to 1.1 billion Australian dollars (US $1.1 billion), although doubts remain about its ability to fund projects that include developing natural gas fields offshore Australia in partnership with ConocoPhillips.

Scott Ashton, a senior energy analyst at BBY in Sydney, said it is too early to be sure the Bilby discovery can be developed commercially. "We do not know the net pay, the quality of the oil, and whether it is capable of flowing," he said in a note.

The well hasn't yet reached its target depth of 4,537 meters and Karoon expects further drilling to encounter a different geological structure, which could also contain oil.

The Bilby-1 discovery follows the success of the Kangaroo-1 well offshore Brazil. However, the drilling program hasn't been a complete success, with the Emu-1 well failing to find commercial quantities of oil.

The fluctuating fortunes of the drilling campaign has intensified volatility in the company's shares. Karoon was worth A$1.6 billion as recently as early March, just before it announced the outcome of the Emu-1 well.

Karoon is planning to test the Kangaroo and Bilby discoveries with appraisal wells.

Citigroup analyst Mark Greenwood said earlier this year that Karoon could eventually reduce its holding in the Brazil venture to 20% to raise funds for drilling and development.

Edward Munks, Karoon's chief operating officer, told The Wall Street Journal in March that the company had several funding options. "Having a discovered resource with high equity levels gives you a lot of flexibility," Mr. Munks said.

Options include a further stake sale, issue of new Karoon shares or an initial public offering of the South American assets. Of these, Mr. Munks said the company isn't likely to revisit an IPO after shelving plans in 2010.

The venture's properties are in much shallower water than giant discoveries made by international energy companies further offshore Brazil, such as the Tupi field.

However, significant commercial discoveries have been made close to the coast. Among the most notable is the Piracuca oil field just five kilometers northeast of Karoon's blocks. Petroleo Brasileiro SA, known as Petrobras, and partner Repsol SA in 2009 declared Piracuca a commercial discovery estimated to contain 550 million barrels of light oil.

Copyright (c) 2013 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

BP: Addressing the Skills Gap

BP: Addressing the Skills Gap

As upstream oil and gas professionals near retirement, many companies in the sector are facing a major shortfall when it comes to the skilled and experienced people they need as the oil and gas industry continues to expand around the world.

The “Great Crew Change” has focused plenty of minds within the upper echelons of the oil and gas industry.

BP plc is one company that has recognized the need to take a proactive approach to training in order to obviate the skills gap challenges that it might face.

In a recent interview with Rigzone, BP Head of Learning and Development Don Shoultz highlighted that for a long time, BP has had a Challenger Program in place that is designed to equip its employees for their first three years with the company.

"We like it and we think it has good branding for recruiting as well. So we are pretty satisfied with that," he said.

Yet, in recent years, BP realized how quickly an oil and gas professional with a few years of experience gets to the same level of competence as a typical 25-year employee is often an arbitrary process. So, the company decided to take steps to help expedite and better manage this development.

"Over the last four years, we've started a program we call the Excellence Program, which starts right after the Challenger Program. So you literally graduate from Challenger and automatically move right into the Excellence Program," Shoultz said.

When coming up with the Excellence Program there was no "secret sauce or magic, silver bullet", according to Shoultz.

"So, as we thought about this the answer we came up with was rigor," he said, explaining that BP looked at the entire gamut of how people learn and get experienced – from formal learning to informal learning, via networks, technical coaching and mentoring.

"When you graduate from the Challenger Program and you move into the Excellence Program you're placed on a job that is intended to continue the development of our staff," Shoultz said.

"And then while you are in that job, which can be from two to three years, you are getting a prescribed program of formal learning that matches the job experience that you are in. And then the informal learning, we really try to formalize so that the technical coach that you need during those … years is prescribed. The networks that you belong to – if you're a water-flooding expert or if you're a reservoir engineer, whatever you are – those networks become more prescribed instead of arbitrary.

"So now, as an employee it's prescribed. What job you have, what formal learning you get at that point, the informal learning is plugged in as well. It's all lined up … It's very intentional. Each employee in every job category has a road map. They can go to a website, they can look at their roadmap if they are a petroleum engineer or petrophysicist … and see their roadmap and know exactly what they need to take, what their next job experience will be, [and] where it will be. All that kind of stuff is laid out. It's far more intentional.

"So really, we think that adding a lot of discipline and alignment will accelerate how an employee develops."

Indeed, BP's approach to training and development, and keeping its staff interested in the work the firm does, appears to be working, according to Shoultz's colleague, BP's Vice President for Upstream Resourcing Julia Harvie-Liddel.

"Certainly, what we are not seeing in BP is a great loss of talent. We are retaining a lot of our more seasoned and experienced staff, and what [we're] doing is we're supplementing this with much greater graduate hiring than we did in the past," Harvie-Liddel said.

"If you look back at what we did when the oil price took a dip during the 1990s and early 2000s, I think we did create a bit of a skills gap then because [the industry] hired less. But … we've worked quite hard since then to significantly increase the number of graduates that we take into the business to supplement the talent and also we're retaining more senior talent."

A satisfying and interesting career is required to help retain talent, added Harvie-Liddel.

"If you look at the portfolio of work we've got and the fact that we're using leading technologies I think people find that very exciting and they'll work beyond their first retirement eligibility point with some degree of ease."

And technology appears to be a way to sell the oil and gas industry to young people who might be considering a career in the sector.

"I hear most of our leadership defines the energy sector as a technology industry. It is energizing how much we depend on technology, and so the opportunity for us is in recruiting is to go out and make future employees aware [of] how exciting this industry is," Shoultz said.

"When you look at the bottom of the seabed in the Gulf of Mexico or Angola it looks like something out of a science fiction movie. It's unbelievable. And we'll drill a well somewhere and we'll tie it back to a rig 25 miles away, under a mile of water. And so, I think the challenge for us … is to get that message out."

Technology, of course, also plays its part in the learning and development process. According to Shoultz, BP now uses a variety of distance-learning technologies when training its staff.

"So, for example, right now I'm sitting in a learning center in Houston … What our leadership tells me is that it's not about bricks and mortar; it's about technology and getting learning out to all the regions," he said.

Of course, BP does not simply operate on its own when it comes to developing talent in the oil and gas sector, and equipping the industry's workers with the skills they need.

"BP is involved in a lot of joint ventures. BP in so many areas is required to get things done through national oil companies, so we have very, very close relationships with national oil companies and the countries themselves … We have to demonstrate to them that we are very good at not only equipping our own people but that we are very good at equipping your people as well, your country's people," Shoultz said.

The company also has a close relationship with a number of other international oil companies and service providers to the industry. Shoultz is particularly proud of BP's increasingly close relationship with Schlumberger Ltd.

"My team has entered into a partnership with Schlumberger in the area of training," he said.

"So my counterpart [at Schlumberger] and I see each other probably a couple of times a year … And so we have a very good understanding on how they do their learning and they have a very good understanding of how we do our learning, and we're actually moving into situations where we start to share."

Internal training and development explains some of BP's success when it comes to addressing the skills gap, but the firm's recruitment function "will always have a role to play", according to Harvie-Liddel. BP's sheer size, and related economies of scale, helps when roles need to be filled quickly!

"What we tend to do with all vacancies is we always look internally. So, we look at our own talent pools before anything will go to the external market," she said.

Of course, getting the raw material in terms of recent graduates into the industry is also highly important.

"I think as an industry it is incumbent upon us to persuade people that we can offer a compelling career and that's something that we all need to continue to work at because there was sporadic hiring during the 1990s and early 2000s. And I think that certainly, among my networks in the industry, we've all learned from that and we understand that that's not something we can do again."

A condensed version of this article originally appeared April 11, 2013 on Rigzone.

A former engineer, Jon is an award-winning editor who has covered the technology, engineering and energy sectors since the mid-1990s. Email Jon at jmainwaring@rigzone.com.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here