Sunday, June 16, 2013

Egdon Awarded North Sea License

UK-focused Egdon Resources reported Thursday that it has been awarded a license for North Sea blocks 41/18 and 41/19 off the North Yorkshire coast by the Department of Energy & Climate Change. The licence was awarded as a result of 26th UK Seaward Licensing Round and Egdon will hold a 100-percent interest as well as operatorship.

Egdon estimates potential for the drilled structure that already exists in the license area, the 41/18-1 well (drilled by Total in 1966), to contain substantial prospective resources in the range of between 40 and 272 billion cubic feet of gas.

Egdon intends to re-evaluate this gas discovery through a work program that will include the acquisition, reprocessing and interpretation of existing 2D seismic data over the blocks together with detailed analysis of the previous well results and regional geological evaluation. Egdon said that it would seek to drill a well from an onshore location to appraise the discovery made by the original 1966 well.

Egdon Managing Director Mark Abbot commented in a company statement:

"We are delighted to have been awarded this 26th Round license over these high potential blocks in one of our focus areas. We believe that our proposed approach of appraising and potentially developing this prospect via an onshore to offshore well could unlock the value in one of the earliest North Sea gas discoveries and we look forward to commencing our detailed technical evaluation."

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Roxi Spuds Kazakh Well

Central Asia-focused Roxi Petroleum announced Wednesday that it spud its BNG Well 143, located on the MJ-F structure on the South Yelemes field in Kazakhstan, on April 1.

The total depth of the well is 8,200 feet and drilling is expected to take around 45 days. The exploration well is targeting Jurassic Callovian sands at a depth of 7,120 feet, while its secondary objective is in Cretaceous Valanginian limestone at a depth of 6,350 feet.

Roxi Chairman Clive Carver commented in a company statement:

"We are pleased to have commenced the 2013 drilling campaign at BNG. This is the first of four planned wells at BNG this year, including two deep wells."

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

FMC Wins Contract to Supply Smorbukk South

Oilfield equipment supplier FMC Technologies reported Wednesday that it has received a $96 million order from Statoil to supply the Smørbukk South extension project in the Norwegian Sea with several subsea components.

The scope of the contract includes ubsea trees, wellheads, a manifold, control systems and other associated equipment.

Smørbukk South is part of the Åsgard development in the Norwegian Sea, and the award is the third order for FMC Technologies from the fast-track portfolio agreement announced in 2012. The equipment is scheduled for delivery in 2014.

Tore Halvorsen, FMC Technologies' senior VP for Subsea Technologies, commented in a statement:

"FMC Technologies has been providing subsea equipment for the Asgard field since 1996."

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

IOCs Line Up for Myanmar Offshore Licenses

IOCs Line Up for Myanmar Offshore Licenses

International oil companies are lining up for the right to prospect in untested waters off the coast of Myanmar. 

But uncertainty over how the once-isolated country will handle the projects and whether it will keep its commitments threaten to damp enthusiasm and delay much-needed revenue for one of Asia's poorest economies. 

Myanmar plans this month or next to accept bids from international investors for control of all its remaining offshore oil and natural-gas blocks – 18 in deep water and seven in shallow water – covering much of the eastern half of the Bay of Bengal. 

The tender comes as President Thein Sein concludes months of lobbying abroad for foreign investment in a country that until two years ago was under international sanctions against its military junta. 

Myanmar already has foreign investment in some blocks, dating from before sanctions were imposed. Malaysia's Petroliam Nasional Bhd. has been producing natural gas from a shallow-water development since 2000. Another is operated by France's Total SA and U.S.-based Chevron Corp. And South Korea's Daewoo International Corp. and Thailand's PTT Exploration & Production PLC this year are expected to start production at offshore wells that the government says will lift Myanmar's daily gas output to 2.2 billion cubic feet by 2015 from 1.4 billion today. 

But industry executives and consultants say hazards in the new blocks are high, citing scarce geological data, Myanmar's inexperienced officials, the possibility that contract terms will change and uncertain corporate governance standards at the country's state oil company. 

Foreign investors will bear all the exploration and development costs in the deep-water blocks. The government's exploration and production arm, Myanma Oil & Gas Enterprise, will have the right to purchase between 15% and 25% in projects that prove commercial, says Aung Kyaw Htoo, an assistant director in Myanmar's Energy Ministry. If initial studies of a block are encouraging, the companies must drill two wells within three years. 

With the cost of hiring a deep-water rig approaching $500,000 a day, only companies with deep pockets can get involved. 

"That's $300 million or more you have to spend in the first five years. It's a substantial investment and may not be worth the risk," says an executive at a European oil company. "I don't have much confidence that the terms they offer won't change several times," he says. 

"For the deep water, it's very risky and highly capital intensive," says Deputy Energy Minister Htin Aung, "so our people may not have the financial or technical capabilities." 

Foreign companies developing onshore and shallow-water blocks must team up with a Myanmar partner, which has spurred more than 100 domestic companies to register with the Energy Ministry. 

Allowing foreign companies to hold controlling stakes is unusual in many resource-rich countries. Yet the exact terms for Myanmar's new offshore developments remain in flux. 

"The fiscal terms, based on some of the analysis that we have done and others have shown us – they will need some working," says Mariano Vela, who runs Chevron's operations in Thailand and Myanmar. "For deep water, we are talking a different kind of . . . cost structure than the country has been accustomed to in the shallow water," he says. A deep-water exploration well will cost around $150 million to drill, he says. 

Possible changes in Myanmar's legal and regulatory system, which some people say is outdated, also pose hazards. 

"Contracting under a legal framework that is changing by the day is a risk," says Nomita Nair of U.K.-based law firm Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP. 

"Too often we see that the decision process becomes a bottleneck, and Myanmar really has to avoid that," says Craig McMahon, a research chief at energy consulting firm Wood Mackenzie Ltd. 

State-run Myanma Oil & Gas Enterprise has been criticized for its business practices and close ties with the military. Opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi has warned foreign governments against allowing their companies to work with MOGE. And Sen. John McCain (R., Ariz.) and former Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut have criticized it for a lack of transparency. 

Myanmar officials say they are working to address the concerns. "Our department is hugely understaffed. . . . We are constantly working on overtime, but are still struggling to meet our timelines," says Zaw Aung, MOGE's director of planning. 

Energy companies likely will recall what happened to mining firms in mineral-rich Mongolia, where the government has been trying to renegotiate contracts to gain more favorable returns. 

"My guess is that Myanmar is getting coaching from other regional governments that have been in similar situations in recent years, and are probably advised not to give up too much control," says Jason Waldie, an associate director at energy consulting firm Douglas-Westwood. 

And to some degree, investors will be flying blind. "The availability of seismic data is very, very limited," says Mr. McMahon, of Wood Mackenzie. "Companies will be invited to bid in the [coming] licensing round without really having sufficient data." 

The auction, nonetheless, appears sure to get lots of interest. 

"We think the resource potential offshore looks very attractive," Malcolm Brown, the vice president for exploration at U.K.-based producer BG Group PLC, said at a March industry conference in Yangon, Myanmar.

Copyright (c) 2013 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Saturday, June 15, 2013

Helix to Provide BP Well Intervention Services in Gulf of Mexico

Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. announced Thursday that it has entered into a five-year contract with BP to provide well intervention services to BP in the US Gulf of Mexico with Helix's deepwater well intervention semisubmersible vessel, the Q5000, currently being constructed in Singapore. The contract is for a minimum 270 days each year and is expected to commence between April and August 2015 following the delivery of the vessel from the shipyard. The contract also includes a first right of refusal for additional days each year and an option to extend for two successive one-year terms.

"We appreciate the confidence BP has shown in our Company's well intervention services, and look forward to this integral step in further executing our business strategy," said Helix President and Chief Executive Officer Owen Kratz.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Mexico's Pemex Renews Scientific Accord with ExxonMobil

MEXICO CITY - Mexico's state-owned oil monopoly Petroleos Mexicanos, or Pemex, said Wednesday it signed a noncommercial agreement with Exxon Mobil Corp. to share technical and scientific information of mutual interest.

Pemex said in a press release that the five-year agreement renews the two oil companies' relations in matters of cooperation. "The goal of this agreement is to define our collaboration in the areas of investigation, scientific development, technical and human resources in exploration, drilling, production, transportation and storage of hydrocarbons," the statement said.

Pemex said the accord did not represent any type of service agreement and did not involve compensation.

Pemex is one of the top oil producers in the world, with about 2.55 million barrels of crude oil a day, along with natural gas production, refineries and other operations. Pemex's biggest operations are in the "easy oil" areas of the shallow southern waters of the Gulf of Mexico, where production has been declining for the last eight years.

ExxonMobil is the world's largest publicly traded international oil and gas company, and produces in nonconventional areas like the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico on the U.S. side. Pemex is just starting exploration in the deep waters of the Mexican side of the Gulf.

Mexico's new president, Enrique Pena Nieto, is negotiating an energy overhaul with legislators to draw more private investment while bolstering the finances of Pemex, which gives nearly all of its profits to the federal government for its budget.

Copyright (c) 2013 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Gas Starts Flowing from Israel's Levant Basin, What Now?

MesoCoat Offers New Process for Clad Pipe Manufacturing

The first gas has started flowing from Israel's supergiant Tamar gasfield in the Levant Basin. Where it will go will redraw the Mediterranean energy map and the geopolitics that goes along with it.

The Tamar field stakeholders announced on 30 March that the gas had started flowing, raising the value of Texas-based Noble Energy Inc., which holds a 36% stake, and Israel's two Delek Group subsidiaries, which each hold a 15.6% stake.

For now, the gas is being pumped to mainland Israel, where it will feed the domestic market, but exports should begin in 2-3 years. What Israel has in mind is the European market, via a hoped-for undersea Mediterranean pipeline to Turkey, which has the infrastructure to get it to Europe.

The competition for this prized market is stiff. In total, the Mediterranean's Levant Basin has an estimated total of 122 trillion cubic feet of gas and 1.7 billion barrels of oil. Lebanon and Cyprus are eyeing the same market for their own Levant Basin gas resources. Cyprus has found gas in its section of the basin, and Lebanon has announced a tender for exploration off its shoreline.

The Greek Cypriot government believes it is sitting on an amazing 60 trillion cubic feet of gas, but these are early days—these aren't proven reserves and commercial viability could be years away. In the best-case scenario, production could feasibly begin in five years. Exports are e ven further afield, with some analysts suggesting 2020 as a start date.

Israel has the upper hand right now in terms of development and production, but it lacks the infrastructure without Turkey.

Israel was originally hoping to lay a pipeline that would traverse both Cyprus and Turkey, but there are too many political pitfalls to this plan (whichwould essentially mean a final resolution to the Turkey-Cyprus spat). The ideal would have been a pipeline that connects all the Levant Basin resources—including Lebanon, Israel, Cyprus and Turkey—but this is the stuff of geopolitical dreams.

In the end, it is shaping up that an Israel-Turkey pipeline is not only possible, but coming to fruition. Earlier this month an official apology from the Israeli prime minister to his Turkish counterpart for some high-level grievances was engineered by US President Barack Obama. It was an unprecedented move by Israel and one that illustrates how important this pipeline is for Israel. An apology was really the only thing keeping Turkey from green-lighting this pipeline project without a backlash at home.

This Israel-Turkey pipeline makes Lebanon and Cyprus nervous. It essentially cuts them out of the equation. Politics for now will keep Lebanon from connecting up to any Israeli pipeline, and Turkey won't have a connector to Cyprus.

Russia's Gazprom, of course, is not keen to lose its stranglehold on the European market. To that end, it's jumped in on Tamar itself, obtaining exclusive rights from Israel to develop the field's liquefied natural gas (LNG). Here's the plan: Russia is hoping to divert Israeli gas exports to Europe by banking on these resources being turned into LNG for Russian export to Asian markets instead. Russia is willing to invest heavily in a $5 billion floating LNG facil ity to this end. In return it gets exclusive rights to purchase and export Tamar LNG. (Gazprom has signed the deal but it still awaits final approval from Israel).

For Israel, this is a windfall. There is an estimated 425 billion cubic meters (16 trillion cubic feet of gas in its Leviathan field, plus the 250 billion cubic meters in the Tamar field, which is now officially pumping. All this gas is worth about $240 billion on the European market, and Tamar gas alone could boost Israel's GDP by 1% annually. For now, the Tamar gas will result in a decline in the price of electricity for Israelis by way of reducing the production costs for the state utility.

For Europe, it will mean newfound power to deal with Russia differently like it did with the recent Cypriot bailout package that came along with a harsh lesson for Russian oligarchs who are seeing their Cypriot banks holdings sequestered.

Source: http://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Nuclear-Power/Gas-Starts-Flowing-from-Israels-Levant-Basin-What-Now.html

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here