by Jeremy pugh
(Mississippi)
Click here to post comments.
Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How?
Simply click here to return to Oil Rig Employment.
Proven to perform on multi-well pads and drill extended reach wells, Veristic's Rocket Rig is an oil field tough drilling rig. The video highlights this land rig's design features - simplicity, speed, and safety. Move Rocket Rig in as few as 12 truck loads. Top drive can travel inside the mast during transport. Assemble Rocket RIg at ground level.
by Jeremy pugh
(Mississippi)
Click here to post comments.
Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How?
Simply click here to return to Oil Rig Employment.
Why did energy supporters in the U.S. Senate stand aside to allow consideration of legislation they oppose – raising taxes on America’s oil and natural gas companies? After all, there were more than enough votes to keep the proposal from coming to the floor.
Simple, in politics you choose the fights you think you can win, and Senate opponents of higher energy taxes feel like they’ve got the American people behind them.
Here’s why. A spate of surveys shows that strong majorities of Americans favor more production of oil and natural gas here at home. Both Gallup and Rasmussen have new polls showing Americans support construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, which would bring up to 830,000 barrels of oil per day from neighbor and ally Canada. Another Rasmussen survey indicates 2-1 support for developing energy from shale via hydraulic fracturing.
Then there was a Pew Research Center poll that suggests the reason for the findings in the others. Pew found that as gasoline prices rise, so does Americans’ interest in greater oil and natural gas production.
A Harris Interactive poll ties things together: It found 76 percent of voters nationwide believe higher taxes on the country’s energy producers could cost them more at the gas pump – which the Congressional Research Service substantiated in a report last year.
Americans’ reaction to increasing fuel costs – driven higher by the rising cost of crude on the global market – is understandable. They’re saying let’s have policies and strategies that could put downward pressure on crude supply as opposed to policies that would make energy producers’ operations costlier – potentially reducing exploration, development and production while elevating prices.
Thus, a Senate debate that supporters of more oil and natural gas production are eager for the American people to see and hear.
Why did energy supporters in the U.S. Senate stand aside to allow consideration of legislation they oppose – raising taxes on America’s oil and natural gas companies? After all, there were more than enough votes to keep the proposal from coming to the floor.
Simple, in politics you choose the fights you think you can win, and Senate opponents of higher energy taxes feel like they’ve got the American people behind them.
Here’s why. A spate of surveys shows that strong majorities of Americans favor more production of oil and natural gas here at home. Both Gallup and Rasmussen have new polls showing Americans support construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, which would bring up to 830,000 barrels of oil per day from neighbor and ally Canada. Another Rasmussen survey indicates 2-1 support for developing energy from shale via hydraulic fracturing.
Then there was a Pew Research Center poll that suggests the reason for the findings in the others. Pew found that as gasoline prices rise, so does Americans’ interest in greater oil and natural gas production.
A Harris Interactive poll ties things together: It found 76 percent of voters nationwide believe higher taxes on the country’s energy producers could cost them more at the gas pump – which the Congressional Research Service substantiated in a report last year.
Americans’ reaction to increasing fuel costs – driven higher by the rising cost of crude on the global market – is understandable. They’re saying let’s have policies and strategies that could put downward pressure on crude supply as opposed to policies that would make energy producers’ operations costlier – potentially reducing exploration, development and production while elevating prices.
Thus, a Senate debate that supporters of more oil and natural gas production are eager for the American people to see and hear.
by Jeremy pugh
(Mississippi)
Click here to post comments.
Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How?
Simply click here to return to Oil Rig Employment.
Bluesense theme designed by Make Money Online | Dosh Dosh
Bloggerized by Free Blogger Template