Showing posts with label Horizon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Horizon. Show all posts

Friday, July 26, 2013

Recruitment & Retention Horizon: Navigating Generation Y

Recruitment & Retention Horizon: Navigating Generation Y

Recruiters are facing many challenges in today's world of employment needs, placing them in a time of great change. The aging workforce is slowly retiring while members of Generation Y, or the millennial generation, are rapidly becoming the go-to candidate to fill the vacant spots in the oil and gas industry.

It is essential for business leaders to do more than just observe the changing times and demographics--they must understand them and be at the forefront of recruiting efforts in order to successfully attract and retain the next generation of oil and gas talent.

"Companies' commitments to employees and career expectations have evolved drastically," said John-Frederick van Zuylen, group manager of Power & Renewable Energy at Allen & York and president of the Dubai chapter for Young Professionals in Energy (YPE).

"Only well-established companies with long-term goals and stable business can afford to have a real recruitment and retention strategy. Other companies need to adapt more frequently and more quickly to changes in the market."

The oil and gas industry contributes significantly to the U.S. economy and is one of the nation's largest employers. Even though the country is still facing a struggling economy, the nation's energy companies provide well-paying jobs, revenue to governments and bountiful opportunities for Americans – totaling an economic contribution that continues to outpace other major industries in North America.

Specifically, the energy stimulus contributed $476 billion to the U.S. economy in 2010, equal to about 60 percent of the 2009 federal stimulus, according to the American Petroleum Institute (API).  And the energy industry currently employs about 9.2 million full-time and part-time jobs, accounting for 5.2 percent of the total employment in the country, according to research data analyzed by PricewaterhouseCoopers.

While America is going through a boom in U.S. oil production, the shortage of skilled, educated workers is hurting the industry's recruiting efforts. There are four big shifts that have radically redefined the workforce and corresponding recruitment, retention and training strategies, according to a white paper released by McCrindle Research in May 2009. These shifts are: an aging population; transitioning generations; increasing options/information; and a redefined work life.

In 2010, there were 40.3 million citizens aged 65 or older in the United States, accounting for 13 percent of the total population, making it the largest age group than in any other decennial census, according to the United States Census Bureau. This number is up from 31.2 million in 1990 and 35 million in 2000. Furthermore, this age group accounts for 57 percent of full-time workers and 42 percent working in management, professional and related occupations. In just 15 years, by 2028, the last of the baby boomers will be reaching retirement age and leaving the labor market. This aging workforce is even more evident in the oil and gas industry; the average age of an O&G worker is 49, considered among the oldest of any industry, according to API.

As veterans and baby-boomers retire, recruiters are forced to focus on the upcoming generation – Generation Y. This generation, which currently makes up about 10 percent of the U.S. workforce, was born between 1980 and 2000. Gen Y, the largest American generation at 92 million strong, compared with some 76 million baby boomers, will make up roughly three-quarters of the work force by 2028 and the oldest millennials will be entering leadership positions by that time, if not sooner.

With generations mixing in the workplace, the need to understand the younger group is ever crucial. Having a mix of generations in the workplace is not new but traditionally, juniors performed menial work while their senior coworkers held managerial positions – roles juniors would eventually fill as they moved up the ranks. This dynamic does not always ring true today. The new reality is that older leaders are managing teams consisting of several generations with diverse backgrounds or young graduates are managing older workers.

Members of "Gen Y will continue to transform the workplace to better suit their needs," stated Stefanie Hanz, a recruitment consultant. "This generation is work-oriented and consistently searching for development opportunities while making sweeping changes to the way organizations and their people work."

Generation Y's wants and needs can vary from those of older workforce generations, according to the whitepaper "The Talent Crisis in Upstream Oil & Gas,"  by Deloitte Research. Unfortunately, the newer generation grew up with some negative perceptions of the oil and gas industry, fed by events such as the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska and suspected price manipulation in the aftermath of hurricanes Katrina, Rita (2005) and Ike (2008).

Furthermore, the millennials witnessed the layoffs of their parents during this period - people who stayed with the same employer for years, if not decades -so by understanding and engaging them, Gen Y will be better facilitated at connecting with older staff and customers.

"Gen Y [wants] clear expectations of work so that they can reach assigned goals but also older generations must allow for Gen Y to prove themselves so that they can exceed expectations instead of being micromanaged," said Hanz. "They want the ability to contribute as individuals and team members but they also want to have the opportunity to make a difference, learn and prove themselves."

This generation also expects feedback, consistently and regularly. Immediate, effective feedback allows millennials to produce better, quicker and more efficiently. The key is to provide constructive criticism in a timely manner.

"Regular feedback is very motivating and is something Gen Y yearns for," said Hanz. "The official 12-month performance review isn't typically enough, and if there is an opportunity for development, let them know in a timely manner. They aren't just looking for praise but are searching for constructive feedback in order to produce better work and grow as individuals."

It has been said that it has never been more difficult to attract, recruit and retain staff than now. But surprisingly, this generation is the most educated workforce ever, and has the ability to travel, work overseas or to retrain for yet another career.

Members of "Gen Y have so many resources at their fingertips that they feel everything should be given to them when wanted," said Matt Gelotti, vice president in Aon's client development group in Houston and YPE's Houston-chapter president.

"Gen Y has the education, and have access to a multitude of information, and they want the paycheck, the notoriety and to be in charge. But as a senior individual at a company, when looking at Gen Y on paper, they lack experience. So this Gen Y person has only mastered hypothetical theories versus real-life experience that molds and teaches an individual through trial and error experiences from the workplace. Overall, Gen Y lacks the patience."

Gen Y is looking for long-term career development but does not have long-term employment loyalty. Those aged 20-24 are three times more likely to change jobs in a year than those aged 45-54, according to Deloitte Research.  

"Moving around is just nature of the beast," said Hanz. "Gen Y is posed to now work on projects or be hired as contract employees [instead of being] hired full-time because employers are shifting away from the typical employment model. Yes, they are known for moving around quite a bit and they will leave if opportunity isn't present."

"The lack of loyalty in Gen Y is looked down upon by baby boomers," commented Gelotti. "Gen Y will easily jump from one employer to another for a dollar or two whereas previous generations wouldn't. They have to move, jump and relocate in order to get more compensation."

This decline in tenure can be viewed as a character flaw in Gen Y but the cause is not a lack of loyalty, nor a poor work ethic; it's merely a response to the changed times.

"So, for most players in the job market, many key functions have become more short-term," reiterated Frederick van Zuylen. "This may sound negative, but it is not necessarily so. The younger generation is more flexible for this new approach and most often welcomes change as an opportunity to experience and get involved in different projects or even different functions."

Employers can capitalize on this generational difference by "developing" Gen Y by providing opportunities to learn through experience; "deploy" them by designing effective organizational roles and environments; and "connect" them by creating seamless networking infrastructures, noted Deloitte Research's white paper.  

The organization created the develop-deploy-connect model that helps for organizations to generate capability, commitment, and alignment in key workforce segments, which in turn improve business performance. The organization says that when this model is implemented, the attraction and retention of skilled talent largely take care of themselves.

By "developing", one can provide real-life learning opportunities that employees need to master a job. Not traditional classroom or online education but by "trial-by-fire" experiences that stretch their capabilities and the lessons they learn from peers, mentors or others.

"Mentors are vital, [even] critical to Gen Y," stated Gelotti. "A mentor that can oversee their growth, watch over them, and lead them is a huge plus in a work environment. It shows that the company is invested in them and their overall professional development. So in the next five to 10 years, this generation can help grow the business."

To "deploy", Deloitte Research suggests working with key individuals to (a) identify their deep-rooted skills, interests, and knowledge, (b) find their best fit in the organization and (c) craft the job design and conditions that help them to perform.

"If companies can show Gen Y that they will have the opportunity to engage with senior management that is also a huge benefit," said Gelotti. "Being in meetings with senior management, their boss' boss, listening to ideas, witnessing how ideas are played out, giving them opportunities to see, hear, learn, to find their niche, are huge bonuses to this generation. They help them to better perform because they feel challenged and excited."

The third talent strategy Deloitte Research suggests is to "connect" by providing critical employees with the tools and guidance they need to (a) build networks that enhance individual and organizational performance, and (b) improve the quality of their interactions with others.

Typically, one would complete levels of traditional education or forgo them entirely, move into the workforce– maybe have a career change or two – and then head into retirement, all the while cautious about separating the work-life balance.

However, Gen Y is open to different roles, phases and careers. The education phase is extending well into adulthood and throughout the work life which in turn helps them form their long-term career goals. This generation needs work arrangements that align individual and organizational needs in flexible ways. Gen Y will experiment with different industries and may revamp their career multiple times, all while looking for opportunities that will take them to other states and countries.

"Relocation opportunities are considered a perk to Gen Y. They are looking to work overseas [and] explore the world while gaining operational experiences globally," said Gelotti.

This generation is work-oriented but requires the flexibility of having multiple employment perks, such as flexible work arrangements that accommodate personal circumstances and working styles. This generation searches for employers that allow for flexibility, opportunities to embrace their entrepreneurial ambitions and the opportunity to use social networks at work without strict corporate guidelines. Gen Y is used to working anywhere and everywhere at any time of day or night on their laptops, tablets and smartphones.

"Often times, people get over worked, burnt out and then have the urge to move on. Employers need to offer opportunities that blend professional and personal time," Gelotti said.

To help with the work-life balance, upstream oil and gas companies can adopt innovative rewards programs that build creativity and flexibility into their work environments, thereby attracting and motivating employees, according to Deloitte Research. Examples of these initiatives can be supplementary rewards programs, such as annual incentive plans, deferred compensation, profit-sharing, stock options, recruiting incentives, flexible work schedules and virtual work alternatives.

The organization also noted that one leading upstream oil and gas firm raised its retention rate to 30 percent above the annual industry norm by funding hands-on training for all drilling employees. These types of strategies target Gen Y and reward performance with flexibility while helping to develop the social infrastructure needed to collaborate effectively stated the organization.

While being criticized as fickle, self-focused, lazy and needing to be coddled, the reality is that Gen Y is just a reflection of its time. Economic cycles come and go, jobs aren't guaranteed and profits are seemingly preeminent--so it is not an inherent selfishness but a response to corporate realities, stated McCrindle Research.

"When companies can offer something unique and compelling that sets them apart from other industry competitors, whether compensation, access to ground-breaking technology, or flexible work arrangements, then employers will attract the best and brightest," said Hanz. "Loyalty and commitment from Gen Y can indeed be garnered."

"You have to hang on to your talent and to do so you have to know your talent," added Gelotti. "These are the people you are counting on to take over the reins 15-20 years down the road, so get to know them. If you invest in them early, the benefits will pay off in the long run."

With more than 10 years of journalism experience, Robin Dupre specializes in the offshore sector of the oil and gas industry. Email Robin at rdupre@rigzone.com.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Thursday, July 18, 2013

BP Confirms Mexican Lawsuit over Deepwater Horizon

Deepwater Horizon Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill

BP Confirms Mexican Lawsuit over Deepwater Horizon

BP confirmed Wednesday that it is being sued by the Mexican government in relation to the Deepwater Horizon disaster. The firm's first quarter results Tuesday revealed that, since March 6, it is among a number of companies named as defendants in more than 2,200 additional civil lawsuits related to the incident.

Plaintiffs include a "foreign government", which press reports speculated was Mexico. In a phone call with Rigzone Tuesday, a BP press officer confirmed that the foreign government is indeed Mexico, which had said back in 2010 that it would look at some sort of action against the company in relation to the Deepwater Horizon spill.

BP is currently evaluating the lawsuits, of which it said the vast majority consist of claims under the US Oil Pollution Act 1990 (OPA 90). BP said it believes that claimants in these new lawsuits may have sought to file them in advance of the third anniversary of the incident on April 20 2013 in order to avoid time bar challenges under OPA 90's three-year statute of limitations.

Meanwhile, BP reported late Tuesday that it has reached agreement with Federal and Natural Resources Damages trustees on two additional proposed early restoration projects in Louisiana that are expected to cost approximately $340 million.

The projects are part of a commitment from BP to provide up to $1 billion in early restoration funding to speed up recovery of natural resources that were damaged as a result of the Deepwater Horizon incident.

"We are extremely pleased to have reached agreement with the trustees on the new projects, which will provide significant long-term benefits to the environment and the people of Louisiana," said Laura Folse, BP's executive vice president for Response and Environmental Restoration.

"With the help of the extensive cleanup efforts, early restoration projects, and natural recovery processes, the Gulf is returning to its baseline condition, which is the condition it would be in if the accident had not occurred."

A former engineer, Jon is an award-winning editor who has covered the technology, engineering and energy sectors since the mid-1990s. Email Jon at jmainwaring@rigzone.com.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Friday, June 14, 2013

Judge Rules CSB Has Jurisdiction Over Deepwater Horizon Accident

Deepwater Horizon Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill

A federal judge has ruled that the U.S. Chemical Safety Board has jurisdiction to investigate the 2010 Deepwater Horizon accident in the Gulf of Mexico.

A Congressional committee had asked the board, which typically investigates accidents at chemical plants and refineries, to examine the oil-rig explosion and accident, which killed 11 workers and triggered the largest offshore oil spill in U.S. history.

But Transocean Ltd., which owned the drilling rig that sank during the explosion, refused to honor subpoenas issued by the board in 2010 and 2011 for documents and employee testimony. It argued that the board lacked jurisdiction over offshore oil spills and that most of the documents had been turned over to other government agencies.

U.S. District Judge Lee Rosenthal disagreed with Transocean, ruling late Monday that it had to honor the subpoenas because legislation that created the board, known as the CSB, didn't bar it from looking at all offshore incidents. He noted that the investigation focused on the explosion on the rig, not the ensuing oil spill. The House Energy and Commerce Committee had asked the board to compare the Deepwater Horizon disaster to a lethal 2005 explosion at what was then BP PLC's Texas City, Texas refinery.

Transocean didn't immediately respond to requests for comment on Tuesday.

"This ruling greatly supports the CSB's ongoing investigation and will enable CSB investigators to access critical information that might have otherwise been unavailable," the board said in a statement.

The board issued a report last July concluding that offshore oil and gas drillers put too much emphasis on issues such as individual worker injuries while neglecting other indicators of danger, such as whether safety equipment is being maintained on schedule.

Copyright (c) 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Judge Rules CSB Has Jurisdiction Over Deepwater Horizon Accident

Deepwater Horizon Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill

A federal judge has ruled that the U.S. Chemical Safety Board has jurisdiction to investigate the 2010 Deepwater Horizon accident in the Gulf of Mexico.

A Congressional committee had asked the board, which typically investigates accidents at chemical plants and refineries, to examine the oil-rig explosion and accident, which killed 11 workers and triggered the largest offshore oil spill in U.S. history.

But Transocean Ltd., which owned the drilling rig that sank during the explosion, refused to honor subpoenas issued by the board in 2010 and 2011 for documents and employee testimony. It argued that the board lacked jurisdiction over offshore oil spills and that most of the documents had been turned over to other government agencies.

U.S. District Judge Lee Rosenthal disagreed with Transocean, ruling late Monday that it had to honor the subpoenas because legislation that created the board, known as the CSB, didn't bar it from looking at all offshore incidents. He noted that the investigation focused on the explosion on the rig, not the ensuing oil spill. The House Energy and Commerce Committee had asked the board to compare the Deepwater Horizon disaster to a lethal 2005 explosion at what was then BP PLC's Texas City, Texas refinery.

Transocean didn't immediately respond to requests for comment on Tuesday.

"This ruling greatly supports the CSB's ongoing investigation and will enable CSB investigators to access critical information that might have otherwise been unavailable," the board said in a statement.

The board issued a report last July concluding that offshore oil and gas drillers put too much emphasis on issues such as individual worker injuries while neglecting other indicators of danger, such as whether safety equipment is being maintained on schedule.

Copyright (c) 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Thursday, April 4, 2013

Witness Says Deepwater Horizon Accident Was 'Classic Failure of Management'

Deepwater Horizon Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill

NEW ORLEANS - An expert witness for plaintiffs suing BP PLC said the 2010 Deepwater Horizon accident was "a classic failure of management and leadership in BP," at the trial here in Federal District Court over liability for the disaster.

Robert Bea, a University of California Berkeley engineering professor who has worked as a safety consultant for BP starting in 2001, said Tuesday that he sent many warnings to the company's management in the years before the accident about how cost-cutting would hurt the safety of operations.

"It was too lean," Mr. Bea said of BP's operations after it reduced spending.

The testimony came on the second day of the civil trial that will determine the degree of culpability that BP and the other companies have for the accident, which killed 11 workers. On Monday lawyers for BP, drilling contractors Transocean Ltd. (RIG) and Halliburton Corp. (HAL), the federal government, Gulf Coast states and local businesses traded barbs over who was to blame for the explosion that unleashed the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history.

Mr. Bea also criticized BP's own internal investigation of the Deepwater Horizon incident for failing to investigate management decisions leading up to the accident. Instead, he said, BP's study, known as The Bly Report, focused on the direct cause of the explosion on the drilling rig and the role that equipment and crew on the rig played.

During cross-examination, Mike Brock, a lawyer for BP, tried to challenge the credibility of Mr. Bea's testimony, emphasizing the limits of his expertise and emphasizing the role the companies suing BP played in providing him information for a report he did that was critical of BP's work leading up to the blowout.

"You understood that the plaintiff's legal team was focused on finding documents that hurt BP, not helped BP?" Mr. Brock asked.

Mr. Bea said he and his colleagues "were searching for the truth, the facts."

Mr. Brock also walked Mr. Bea through many efforts the company and its management made over the years to improve its safety operations, including surveying workers about safety operations.

BP has argued that the accident was due to many errors and misjudgments by all of the companies involved in the project, including rig owner Transocean and cement contractor Halliburton.

Other witnesses expected soon include Lamar McKay, chairman and president of BP Americas, and previously recorded depositions of former BP CEO Tony Hayward and Kevin Lacy, the former head of BP's Gulf of Mexico operations.

A second trial, scheduled for the fall, will determine how much oil leaked into the Gulf of Mexico. Together, they will determine the size of fines the companies face under the Clean Water Act, which could total as much as $17.6 billion.

BP, which hired Transocean and Halliburton to work on drilling its well, has said the fines would likely be under $5 billion.

Copyright (c) 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Monday, March 25, 2013

BP to 'Vigorously' Defend Itself in Deepwater Horizon Civil Trial

BP to 'Vigorously' Defend Itself in Deepwater Horizon Civil Trial

BP insisted Tuesday that it will defend itself "vigorously" against gross negligence allegations during the Deepwater Horizon civil liability trial, which starts next Monday.

The first phase of the civil trial – to be held in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana – will be focused on the causes of the Deepwater Horizon accident and will examine who should be held responsible and to what degree.

"We have always been open to settlements on reasonable terms, failing which we have always been prepared to defend our case at trial. Faced with demands that are excessive and not based on reality or the merits of the case, we are going to trial," said Rupert Bondy, Group General Counsel of BP. "We have confidence in our case and in the legal team representing the company and defending our interests."

The court will ultimately determine whether BP or any other party was grossly negligent, but BP strongly disputes this charge.

"Gross negligence is a very high bar that BP believes cannot be met in this case,” said Mr Bondy. “This was a tragic accident, resulting from multiple causes and involving multiple parties. We firmly believe we were not grossly negligent."

Last November, BP and the U.S. government agreed to resolve all Federal charges and all Securities and Exchange Commission claims connected to the April 2010 disaster in return for $4.5 billion settlement paid by BP.

As part of the deal, BP agreed to plead guilty to 11 felony counts of "misconduct or neglect of ships officers" relating to the loss of the lives of 11 people as a result of the accident. It also agreed to plead guilty to one misdemeanor count under the Clean Water Act, one misdemeanour count under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and one felony count of obstruction of Congress.

The Deepwater Horizon explosion on April 20, 2010 resulted in the largest offshore spill in U.S. history.

A former engineer, Jon is an award-winning editor who has covered the technology, engineering and energy sectors since the mid-1990s. Email Jon at jmainwaring@rigzone.com.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

BP to 'Vigorously' Defend Itself in Deepwater Horizon Civil Trial

BP to 'Vigorously' Defend Itself in Deepwater Horizon Civil Trial

BP insisted Tuesday that it will defend itself "vigorously" against gross negligence allegations during the Deepwater Horizon civil liability trial, which starts next Monday.

The first phase of the civil trial – to be held in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana – will be focused on the causes of the Deepwater Horizon accident and will examine who should be held responsible and to what degree.

"We have always been open to settlements on reasonable terms, failing which we have always been prepared to defend our case at trial. Faced with demands that are excessive and not based on reality or the merits of the case, we are going to trial," said Rupert Bondy, Group General Counsel of BP. "We have confidence in our case and in the legal team representing the company and defending our interests."

The court will ultimately determine whether BP or any other party was grossly negligent, but BP strongly disputes this charge.

"Gross negligence is a very high bar that BP believes cannot be met in this case,” said Mr Bondy. “This was a tragic accident, resulting from multiple causes and involving multiple parties. We firmly believe we were not grossly negligent."

Last November, BP and the U.S. government agreed to resolve all Federal charges and all Securities and Exchange Commission claims connected to the April 2010 disaster in return for $4.5 billion settlement paid by BP.

As part of the deal, BP agreed to plead guilty to 11 felony counts of "misconduct or neglect of ships officers" relating to the loss of the lives of 11 people as a result of the accident. It also agreed to plead guilty to one misdemeanor count under the Clean Water Act, one misdemeanour count under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and one felony count of obstruction of Congress.

The Deepwater Horizon explosion on April 20, 2010 resulted in the largest offshore spill in U.S. history.

A former engineer, Jon is an award-winning editor who has covered the technology, engineering and energy sectors since the mid-1990s. Email Jon at jmainwaring@rigzone.com.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Gas Bonanza On Horizon for Broke Cyprus

In the depths of an economic crisis, the islanders of Cyprus are looking out to sea for the promise of a gas bonanza on the horizon to come to their rescue.

The promise is centered on an empty lot leading down to the sea, sandwiched between a power station and naval base, that is to be home to a gas liquefaction plant which will net tens of billions of dollars.

Cypriot authorities are dangling the promise of salvation for an economy desperately in need of an EU bailout through a gas bonanza.

"As a country, we are committed to it. It will be built," said Charles Ellinas, executive president of Cyprus National Hydrocarbon Company, a privately run but government-financed structure set up in January to manage and develop the sector.

In December 2011, US major Noble Energy announced the discovery of gas reserves of up to 8.0 trillion cubic feet (226.5 billion cubic meters) in a field named Aphrodite, with an estimated value of 100 billion euros.

Cyprus has in the space of a few weeks signed additional agreements with French energy giant Total and a consortium between ENI of Italy and South Korea's Kogas for oil and gas exploration in its eastern Mediterranean waters.

"There is still work to do to prove that the gas is here, but we are very optimistic. Why would major companies like Total invest so much money in drilling if there was nothing to be found?" asked Ellinas.

Last week, Energy Minister Neoklis Sylikiotis said: "At last our lenders must realize that this economy has prospects and there cannot be any doubt about whether the debt will be sustainable... as a result... of our natural wealth."

Located just a few miles (kilometers) from the resort of Limassol on the south coast, the Vassilikos site also aims to treat gas from Israeli and Lebanese waters, with initial output of five billion cubic meters (176 billion cubic feet) a year.

Ellinas said the figure would be more than tripled.

The target date for completion of the first phase of the project -- estimated to cost almost $10 billion (7.4 billion euros) -- is 2015, with construction starting next year and exports in 2019.

The government says the work will create between 5,000 and 10,000 jobs, mostly for specialized foreign staff, and also generate four times more indirect jobs, a boon for a country with only 840,000 residents.

But Peter Wallace, a British consultant on LNG projects, is skeptical, regarding the timetable as too ambitious for such a small nation.

"Here they have no concept of the scale of things. There are too many people who want to put their hand on the pie and don't know anything about the matter," according to Wallace.

"Cypriot people are more concerned about what they can get for themselves than the good of the island. They are more interested in making the wrong decision than in making any decision at all, as we saw with the explosion. And they've got no money."

An arms cache blast in July 2011 at the nearby Mari naval base left 13 dead and knocked out the main power station, sparking political rows and adding power cuts to a banking and financial crisis on a holiday island long used to its affluent status.

Growth has since been replaced by recession and unemployment has more than doubled to more than 14 percent, leaving Cyprus at
the mercy of an EU bailout plan which is conditional on harsh austerity measures.

Apart from the technical challenges, the Greek Cypriot administration of divided Cyprus faces the ire of neighboring giant Turkey as it presses ahead with its ambition of becoming a regional energy hub.

Turkey has angrily protested against Nicosia's energy search, despite the involvement of US and Israeli firms, branding it illegal and beginning its own exploratory drilling off the breakaway north of the island.

But all three main candidates in Sunday's presidential election have thrown their full weight behind the gas project.

"Everybody wants this to succeed, because there is nothing else. This is our future," Ellinas said. 

Copyright 2013 Plus Media Solutions Private Limited All Rights Reserved

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here