Showing posts with label McClendon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label McClendon. Show all posts

Friday, July 5, 2013

Chesapeake Relaxes Non-Compete Clause for Ex-CEO McClendon

Chesapeake Energy Corp. will allow former Chief Executive Aubrey McClendon to acquire oil and gas holdings adjacent to the company's wells in which he is a part-owner, relaxing a contractual restriction that limited his ability to compete with the company.

The Oklahoma City-based company disclosed that it had altered terms from Mr. McClendon's last employment contract in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Friday afternoon.

The agreement had restricted Mr. McClendon from acquiring, or helping others acquire, oil and gas assets immediately next to Chesapeake.

A Chesapeake spokesman said he had no comment on the filing. A spokesman for Mr. McClendon didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Mr. McClendon, 53, left Chesapeake earlier this month after co-founding the natural-gas producer in 1989 and building it into the country's second-biggest natural-gas producer after Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM).

He has registered two companies in Oklahoma, McClendon Operating Energy Inc., which is the joint partner of American Energy Partners, and leased office space about a mile from Chesapeake.

Chesapeake will pay Mr. McClendon nearly $50 million in severance, with the last payment due in 2014. The company also disclosed Friday that it will allow him the use of a company Citation X aircraft through 2016.

Mr. McClendon remains deeply invested in Chesapeake. Through an unusual perk, he has acquired small stakes in almost every well Chesapeake has drilled, sharing equally in the costs and profits of the well.

But the expense of the program has led Mr. McClendon to borrow heavily. He has pledged his interests in Chesapeake's wells to secure loans for more than $1 billion, including from a private-equity group that has done deals with Chesapeake.

The revelation of Mr. McClendon's borrowing practices last year sparked a governance controversy.

Copyright (c) 2013 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

For CEOs Like McClendon, Buyout Game Can Be Second Act

For CEOs Like McClendon, Buyout Game Can Be Second Act

As Aubrey McClendon's days as Chesapeake Energy Corp.'s chief executive tick down, he's exploring ways to remain in the energy game.

Less than two months after agreeing to leave Chesapeake under pressure from shareholders over his free-spending ways, Mr. McClendon is meeting with private-equity investors and others to discuss potentially teaming up for new ventures, according to several people familiar with the discussions.

Mr. McClendon also has spoken with energy executives who in the past worked with buyout shops. At this juncture, Mr. McClendon is asking more questions than he is sharing details of future plans. Among his queries: How much autonomy and control would he have if he received financing from a Wall Street firm, according to one person he's spoken with.

Mr. McClendon, 53 years old, has some employees for his next venture, according to a person familiar with the matter, and secured office space in a six-story, glass-and-concrete building in Oklahoma City. His new digs are about a mile east of the sprawling, university-like campus he helped design for Chesapeake, the energy power he co-founded in 1989.

Mr. McClendon declined to comment.

If Mr. McClendon ends up in private equity, he will be following a path trod by other high-profile executives who have landed on their feet in the private-equity world.

Robert Nardelli, the former chief executive of Chrysler Group LLC and Home Depot, in 2009 joined private-equity firm Cerberus Capital Management LP. He left a year ago to focus on his own investment firm, he said at the time. He declined to comment.

Lord John Browne, who resigned as chief executive officer of BP in 2007, joined Riverstone Holdings LLC. He couldn't be reached for comment.

The relationship can be symbiotic: Private-equity firms crave the expertise and Rolodexes of former top managers, while the executives like working away from public scrutiny and the tyranny of quarterly earnings.

Performance isn't judged on "what happens from quarter to quarter, it's about what happens to the fund over the life of the fund," said David B. Miller, who co-founded private-equity firm EnCap Investments LLC after running an energy company, Maze Exploration Inc.

One challenge, Mr. Miller said, is that institutional investors tend to have lower risk tolerance than shareholders in public stock markets.

Set to step down from Chesapeake by April 1, Mr. McClendon is leaving on a low note. After building Chesapeake into the nation's second-biggest natural-gas producer after Exxon Mobil Corp., his last year at the company was marred by a wrong-way bet on natural gas that left the company exposed to a collapse in prices.

Meanwhile, Mr. McClendon's personal borrowing practices ignited a governance controversy last year. Shareholders soured on his spending amid the stock's recent disappointments, leading to his ouster. Some private-equity investors said the controversy might reduce the enthusiasm of some to work with the Chesapeake co-founder.

Still, Mr. McClendon is regarded by some as a visionary who helped lead a revolution in American energy extraction.

"I think he'll likely have several opportunities to partner with private-equity firms interested in energy," says Scott Sperling, co-president of Thomas H. Lee Partners. "After a few months out of the news, people probably will just remember that he was a guy who did some pretty interesting things" rather than someone who left his company amid negative headlines.

Any foray by Mr. McClendon into energy would be complicated by his contractual restrictions not to compete with Chesapeake.

Mr. McClendon's contract with Chesapeake bars him from using confidential information he acquired there for a year. It also prohibits him from acquiring, or helping someone else acquire, oil and gas interests immediately adjacent to the company's holdings while he continues to receive severance payments. Chesapeake has drilling rights to 15 million acres nationwide, spanning some of the country's most prolific oil-and-gas-producing zones, which could make it difficult for Mr. McClendon to operate in the same regions-even if he weren't directly involved.

"He can't do indirectly what he can't do directly," said Michael P. Maslanka, a partner at Dallas-based Constangy Brooks & Smith LLP who specializes in employment law. "You can wall him off, but the question becomes, 'How effectively did you wall him off?'"

Though Chesapeake said it would pay him a severance of nearly $50 million over four years, Mr. McClendon's next move will likely require other people's money. The executive once owned 33.5 million Chesapeake shares-worth $2.3 billion at their 2008 peak--and pledged them as collateral for loans to buy more shares. When Chesapeake's stock tumbled later that year, the value of his collateral fell below the level required and he was forced to sell most of his shares. Much of his personal fortune, including a 19.2% stake in the Oklahoma City Thunder basketball team, has been pledged as collateral to secure loans.

Through a controversial perk, Mr. McClendon can choose whether to invest in every well Chesapeake drills. The disclosure of his borrowing--he pledged his interests in the wells to secure up to $1.4 billion in loans from a private-equity group that also did business with Chesapeake--triggered shareholder lawsuits. The Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating the arrangement.

Chesapeake's board said in February it found no "intentional misconduct" by Mr. McClendon, who agreed to terminate the perk in June 2014.

T. Boone Pickens, whose own wrong-way bet on natural gas-prices in the 1990s led to his ouster at the energy company he had built, later went on to found a hedge fund. He says he recently met with Mr. McClendon, a fellow Oklahoma native, and that his friend's problem was having more ideas than money to finance them.

"He tried to buy the world," said Mr. Pickens, whose hedge fund sold all of its half-million Chesapeake shares last year.

Still, he said Mr. McClendon won't have any trouble raising money. "I'd invest with him," he said.

Copyright (c) 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Post a Comment Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Chesapeake Asset Sales Likely to Accelerate with McClendon Departure

Chesapeake Energy's asset sale pace will likely accelerate beyond $17 billion to $19 billion in assets for 2012/2013 in light of co-founder and CEO Aubrey McClendon's departure in April, as the company's board will likely favor pulling the present value of Chesapeake's massive 15.1 million undeveloped acreage forward, according to a Jan. 30 research note from GHS Research.

The pending departure of McClendon over "philosophical differences" took GHS analysts by surprise. In a meeting with McClendon in last year's fourth quarter, GHS analysts said they came away thinking that these philosophies were more in line than worlds apart.

"In fact we were told that everything positive that could come from tighter corporate discipline at Chesapeake would in fact emerge," according to a Jan. 30 GHS research note.

Analysts were also told that the board was on the right track in terms of setting management's 2013 bonus criteria in which return on capital, efficiency gains, and hitting budgets would be the favored incentives versus prior year targets that centered almost entirely on growth.

Chesapeake Chairman Archie Dunham told company employees in an email that Chesapeake is not for sale. GHS does see value for a major who might want to make a play on Chesapeake, which has massive undeveloped acreage positions in plays such as the Utica, Marcellus, Eagle Ford, Mississippian and Power River/DJ Basin.

However, Chesapeake's intimidating capital structure, which includes seven joint ventures, $12.6 billion in long-term debt, $3 billion in preferred equity, and $2.4 billion non-controlling interests, present complications.

"We think that a major with lower cost of capital versus Chesapeake can quickly get to a starting point of $30/share of value fairly easy," GHS noted.

To meet future funding gaps, Chesapeake needs to sell a large, desirable position of undeveloped acreage in order to right-size its balance sheet, as selling production by itself is not accretive to multiples, and the loss of cash flow generation offsets an improved balance sheet, according to a Jan. 30 research note from TPH Energy Research.

"Given the current strategy, the Marcellus is the only gassy asset that fits the bill," said TPH analysts, who believe Chesapeake's Marcellus asset could fetch $8 billion, or $6.4 billion after tax.

Even after selling its single most valuable asset, it's not enough to repair the long-term leverage trajectory without making other adjustments to future plans, such as scaling back leasing and spending less on ancillary investments.

A sale of Marcellus assets would reduce 2013 cash flow by $550 to $600 million, according to TPH estimates, while reducing aggregate production by 22 percent. The cost structure of the company also would change slightly with gas differentials worsening by 10 percent to 15 percent, given transportation commitments on other assets.

All else equal and assuming no incrementally announced asset sales, TPH anticipates the company will reaccumulate $9 billion in new debt by year-end 2015 which again puts the balance sheet in an undesirable position. Chesapeake would have to further reduce drilling activity in the Mississippi Lime and the Cleveland-Tonkawa, and reduce capital expenditures by $500 million to $1 billion per year, and leasing by $300 million per year.

"Only then would Chesapeake's outspend be in-line with cash flow growth by 2015," TPH noted.

Karen Boman has more than 10 years of experience covering the upstream oil and gas sector. Email Karen at kboman@rigzone.com.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Monday, February 11, 2013

Chesapeake Asset Sales Likely to Accelerate with McClendon Departure

Chesapeake Energy's asset sale pace will likely accelerate beyond $17 billion to $19 billion in assets for 2012/2013 in light of co-founder and CEO Aubrey McClendon's departure in April, as the company's board will likely favor pulling the present value of Chesapeake's massive 15.1 million undeveloped acreage forward, according to a Jan. 30 research note from GHS Research.

The pending departure of McClendon over "philosophical differences" took GHS analysts by surprise. In a meeting with McClendon in last year's fourth quarter, GHS analysts said they came away thinking that these philosophies were more in line than worlds apart.

"In fact we were told that everything positive that could come from tighter corporate discipline at Chesapeake would in fact emerge," according to a Jan. 30 GHS research note.

Analysts were also told that the board was on the right track in terms of setting management's 2013 bonus criteria in which return on capital, efficiency gains, and hitting budgets would be the favored incentives versus prior year targets that centered almost entirely on growth.

Chesapeake Chairman Archie Dunham told company employees in an email that Chesapeake is not for sale. GHS does see value for a major who might want to make a play on Chesapeake, which has massive undeveloped acreage positions in plays such as the Utica, Marcellus, Eagle Ford, Mississippian and Power River/DJ Basin.

However, Chesapeake's intimidating capital structure, which includes seven joint ventures, $12.6 billion in long-term debt, $3 billion in preferred equity, and $2.4 billion non-controlling interests, present complications.

"We think that a major with lower cost of capital versus Chesapeake can quickly get to a starting point of $30/share of value fairly easy," GHS noted.

To meet future funding gaps, Chesapeake needs to sell a large, desirable position of undeveloped acreage in order to right-size its balance sheet, as selling production by itself is not accretive to multiples, and the loss of cash flow generation offsets an improved balance sheet, according to a Jan. 30 research note from TPH Energy Research.

"Given the current strategy, the Marcellus is the only gassy asset that fits the bill," said TPH analysts, who believe Chesapeake's Marcellus asset could fetch $8 billion, or $6.4 billion after tax.

Even after selling its single most valuable asset, it's not enough to repair the long-term leverage trajectory without making other adjustments to future plans, such as scaling back leasing and spending less on ancillary investments.

A sale of Marcellus assets would reduce 2013 cash flow by $550 to $600 million, according to TPH estimates, while reducing aggregate production by 22 percent. The cost structure of the company also would change slightly with gas differentials worsening by 10 percent to 15 percent, given transportation commitments on other assets.

All else equal and assuming no incrementally announced asset sales, TPH anticipates the company will reaccumulate $9 billion in new debt by year-end 2015 which again puts the balance sheet in an undesirable position. Chesapeake would have to further reduce drilling activity in the Mississippi Lime and the Cleveland-Tonkawa, and reduce capital expenditures by $500 million to $1 billion per year, and leasing by $300 million per year.

"Only then would Chesapeake's outspend be in-line with cash flow growth by 2015," TPH noted.

Karen Boman has more than 10 years of experience covering the upstream oil and gas sector. Email Karen at kboman@rigzone.com.

Post a Comment Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here