Showing posts with label Working. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Working. Show all posts

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Schlumberger and PdVSA Working Things Out

Schlumberger Ltd. said Monday it expects to keep working in Venezuela and is on the way to resolving its problems with that nation's state-run oil giant, which owes the oil-service provider hundreds of millions of dollars.

The announcement came two weeks after Schlumberger Chief Executive Paal Kibsgaards cited "collection issues" while saying that the company would "temporarily" cut back on activity.

Venezuela depends on international oilfield-services companies' help it develop its vast oil resources, analysts say. But they add that the country's government also relies on its national oil company, Petroleos de Venezuela, or PdVSA, as a source of cash to finance some social programs--leaving it short on cash at times.

Venezuela's oil minister, Rafael Ramirez, told reporters on March 22 that PdVSA's debts to service providers rose by 35% in 2012 compared with the previous year, when it said it owed service providers more than $12 billion.

PdVSA has not yet released its complete 2012 financial results, but said in a report on its website that its total debt rose 15% to $40 billion last year.

Still, Schlumberger has offered few specifics on what has changed in its relationship with PdVSA that led the company to stay.

Mr. Kibsgaards, in a statement posted on the company's website Sunday, said that collections from Venezuela have improved to the point where the company will recognize revenue from Venezuela in its first-quarter operations.

"We further expect to finalize a new payment agreement with PdVSA," he said, adding, "we anticipate ramping up activity to meet the current and future needs [of PdVSA]."

Schlumberger wrote in its most recent annual report that Venezuela accounts for between 5% and 10% of its outstanding payment balance, which puts the amount it is owed at $650 million and $1 billion--one of only five countries to account for that much.

Last month, after Mr. Kibsgaards's comments on cutting back on activities, Oil Minister Ramirez, who is also PdVSA's chief, said that many statements were taken out of context by various media outlets, incorrectly suggesting tensions were high between PdVSA and its partners.

Mr. Ramirez said he was visited by the Schlumberger head and had a "very good meeting" where "we clarified all of the issues."

"We don't just resolve our problems through the microphone. We called the president of Schlumberger. He showed up yesterday," Mr. Ramirez told reporters at the PdVSA headquarters in Caracas on March 22. He added that the Schlumberger chief will return to Venezuela at the end of April to tour the Orinoco heavy oil belt with PdVSA officials "to see the big push our guys are making out there in drilling and production."

In securities filings, several oil-field-services companies have complained about delayed payments from PdVSA and have said they are owed hundreds of millions of dollars for their work there, in addition to write-downs some have had to take after Venezuela announced a surprise devaluation of its currency earlier this year.

Barclays analyst James West said Monday that Schlumberger "took a hard line" with PdVSA, and the Schlumberger report of progress on the issue is good news for the other Big Four services companies--Halliburton Co., Baker Hughes Inc. and Weatherford International, which all have significant operations in Venezuela.

Mr. West said that although there have been periods of nonpayment in Venezuela depending on what else is going on in the country politically, some 95% of all receivables have been paid eventually.

"It ebbs and flows. When there's an election, PdVSA tends to stop paying," he said. "Usually over time, the majority of it is resolved for the big services companies."

Copyright (c) 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Schlumberger and PdVSA Working Things Out

Schlumberger Ltd. said Monday it expects to keep working in Venezuela and is on the way to resolving its problems with that nation's state-run oil giant, which owes the oil-service provider hundreds of millions of dollars.

The announcement came two weeks after Schlumberger Chief Executive Paal Kibsgaards cited "collection issues" while saying that the company would "temporarily" cut back on activity.

Venezuela depends on international oilfield-services companies' help it develop its vast oil resources, analysts say. But they add that the country's government also relies on its national oil company, Petroleos de Venezuela, or PdVSA, as a source of cash to finance some social programs--leaving it short on cash at times.

Venezuela's oil minister, Rafael Ramirez, told reporters on March 22 that PdVSA's debts to service providers rose by 35% in 2012 compared with the previous year, when it said it owed service providers more than $12 billion.

PdVSA has not yet released its complete 2012 financial results, but said in a report on its website that its total debt rose 15% to $40 billion last year.

Still, Schlumberger has offered few specifics on what has changed in its relationship with PdVSA that led the company to stay.

Mr. Kibsgaards, in a statement posted on the company's website Sunday, said that collections from Venezuela have improved to the point where the company will recognize revenue from Venezuela in its first-quarter operations.

"We further expect to finalize a new payment agreement with PdVSA," he said, adding, "we anticipate ramping up activity to meet the current and future needs [of PdVSA]."

Schlumberger wrote in its most recent annual report that Venezuela accounts for between 5% and 10% of its outstanding payment balance, which puts the amount it is owed at $650 million and $1 billion--one of only five countries to account for that much.

Last month, after Mr. Kibsgaards's comments on cutting back on activities, Oil Minister Ramirez, who is also PdVSA's chief, said that many statements were taken out of context by various media outlets, incorrectly suggesting tensions were high between PdVSA and its partners.

Mr. Ramirez said he was visited by the Schlumberger head and had a "very good meeting" where "we clarified all of the issues."

"We don't just resolve our problems through the microphone. We called the president of Schlumberger. He showed up yesterday," Mr. Ramirez told reporters at the PdVSA headquarters in Caracas on March 22. He added that the Schlumberger chief will return to Venezuela at the end of April to tour the Orinoco heavy oil belt with PdVSA officials "to see the big push our guys are making out there in drilling and production."

In securities filings, several oil-field-services companies have complained about delayed payments from PdVSA and have said they are owed hundreds of millions of dollars for their work there, in addition to write-downs some have had to take after Venezuela announced a surprise devaluation of its currency earlier this year.

Barclays analyst James West said Monday that Schlumberger "took a hard line" with PdVSA, and the Schlumberger report of progress on the issue is good news for the other Big Four services companies--Halliburton Co., Baker Hughes Inc. and Weatherford International, which all have significant operations in Venezuela.

Mr. West said that although there have been periods of nonpayment in Venezuela depending on what else is going on in the country politically, some 95% of all receivables have been paid eventually.

"It ebbs and flows. When there's an election, PdVSA tends to stop paying," he said. "Usually over time, the majority of it is resolved for the big services companies."

Copyright (c) 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Friday, May 24, 2013

Chevron Committed to Working with Romania on Shale Gas Issues

Chevron Corp. remains committed to working with the Romanian government to address any concerns regarding shale gas development in Romania, a company spokesperson told Rigzone in an email statement.

Romania has ended a moratorium on shale gas exploration in order to boost its domestic energy resources and reduce its dependence on Russian fuel imports, Bloomberg reported Tuesday.

Meanwhile, Chevron has received no official notification from the Romanian government of a moratorium, a company spokesperson said. Gas development and production from shale formations has a proven record of being done in a safe and environmentally responsible manner, the spokesperson added.

Romania's government last year said it would seek a moratorium on shale gas drilling until European studies underway regarding hydraulic fracturing's environmental impact are finalized, Dow Jones Newswires reported.

Chevron began exploring for shale gas in Romania in 2010 after it was awarded three onshore blocks in the Dobrogea area in southwest Romania. Chevron in March 2012 obtained concessions for these blocks, which the company owns and operates. The blocks cover approximately 670,000 acres.

Karen Boman has more than 10 years of experience covering the upstream oil and gas sector. Email Karen at kboman@rigzone.com.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Monday, May 20, 2013

Gov. Hickenlooper working overtime to bring toxic waste and pollution to your neighborhood!

A lot’s changed since 1955 when a gallon of gas was about 29 cents. One thing that hasn’t changed are Colorado’s fines for oil and gas drilling violations – despite a huge drilling boom and large increase in spills over the past several years. Under current law, most violations can’t be fined more than a $1,000 per day, with an overall cap of $10,000.

And it turns out that the state rarely enforces these laws. Analyses by the Denver Post and Fort Collins Coloradoan found that that state regulators rarely fine violators who pollute, and less than 7 percent of industry violations since 1996 have resulted in fines.

The Parachute Creek spill, caused by Williams, has polluted soil and water with cancer causing benzene and yet 56 days later, Williams has yet to be fined for polluting and risking public health.

Despite all of this, not only has Governor Hickenlooper failed to stand up for Colorado families and protect public health, but he’s actually working overtime to help make it easier for the oil and gas industry to pollute your water and communities.

According to a new report from the Center for Western Priorities, six oil and gas companies were responsible for 85 percent of all the spills that resulted in water contamination last year. Turns out that Governor Hickenlooper’s ‘besties’ Anadarko Petroleum subsidiary and Noble Energy, Inc. (of the Anadarko-Noble loophole) were two of the six big polluters.

Earlier this week, Fox 31 Denver reported that Gov. Hickenlooper watered down legislation to protect public health and water by strengthening oil and gas drilling violation fines.

Apparently, these laws just aren’t lax enough for Governor Hickenlooper and his oil and gas industry boosters. According to the Fox 31’s news coverage:

“Andy White, the governor’s [Hickenlooper] lobbyist on all oil and gas-related legislation…sided Friday with Republicans on the Appropriations Committee and stripped those provisions — the minimum daily fine and the removal of an overall cap on fees — from the bill before sending it to the Senate floor.”

Now the question is: Will the state legislature do the right thing – protect public health and water- by holding the oil and gas companies responsible when they pollute or will Gov. Hickenpuppet continue doing the bidding of the oil and gas industry to the detriment to Colorado families and communities?


View the original article here

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Brenham Oil, Gas Adds Working Interest in Texas Field

Brenham Oil & Gas Corp., a majority owned subsidiary of American International Industries, Inc., (AMIN) (American), announced it acquired a 10 percent working interest in the Pierce Junction Oil & Gas Field in Houston, Texas.

"The Pierce Junction field is one of the oldest and most prolific fields in the Houston area. This field has been producing oil & gas since 1921 and has produced over 104 million barrels of oil since that time mostly from Miocene, Frio, and Vicksburg reservoirs," Bryant Mook, Brenham's recently elected president, stated.

Brenham's asset acquisition includes eight producing wells with an additional seven wells scheduled for mechanical work-over that should add more oil reserves to Brenham. Additional offsetting acreage can be developed by Brenham on a well by well basis to produce additional oil reserves from several producing horizons.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

New World Gets Govt Nod for Working Interest in Danish Licenses

New World Oil and Gas announced Monday that the Danish Energy Authority has formally approved the assignment to the company of a 25-percent working interest in Licence 1/08 of the Danica Resources Project in Denmark.

Licence 1/08 is located in the productive Western Baltic region of the South Permian Basin in Southern Denmark, totaling 2,479 square miles, according to New World.

The assignment of 25-percent working interest to New World is in accordance with the previous Farm-Out Agreement announced April 17, 2012 and follows the completion of Phase 1 of a 2D seismic acquisition program consisting of 64.26 square miles, and an additional 14.9 square miles 2D seismic acquisition program on two re-confirmed leads.

After this seismic acquisition program, New World estimates that the drill-ready Als prospect has an estimated P50 un-risked prospective recoverable resources of 1.4 trillion cubic feet and 97 million barrels of oil.

Additionally, the firm said four previously-identified Zechstein leads were confirmed on Falster and Lolland Islands from the new seismic data on which a 23.9-mile 2D acquisition program has recently been completed. Results from this 2-D program targeting these large leads which total 13,485 acres will be released in 2Q 2013.

New World CEO William Kelleher commented in a statement:

"We are delighted to have now earned into a 25 percent working interest in both of our Danish projects. In tandem with increasing our interests in these three exciting licenses, we are delivering on our strategy to systematically identify, delineate and de-risk multiple prospects to the point of drilling... With results expected in Q2 2013 there remains tremendous scope to materially add to the P50 prospective resources on the license, particularly bearing in mind the size of Als' volumetrics. I look forward to updating the market on our progress."

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Iraq 2013 Budget Allocates $650M to Firms Working in Kurdistan

The Iraqi parliament Thursday passed the country's 2013 budget, allocating some $650 million to central government payments to companies working in Kurdistan, a leading Iraqi lawmaker said.

Ibrahim al-Mutlaq, a member of the parliamentary finance committee, said Kurds boycotted the session which led to the passing of the budget. They had asked for 4.2 trillion Iraqi dinars ($3.5 billion) to be paid to companies producing oil and gas in Kurdistan.

Kurdish officials weren't immediately available to comment.

The Iraqi parliament postponed a vote on the 2013 budget, running at $118.6 billion, many times because lawmakers differ on whether Baghdad should allocate money to companies working in Kurdistan, in the north of the country.

The Kurds have suspended crude oil exports via the Baghdad-controlled export pipeline since December last year, protesting against delays in payment to producing companies in the region. Even in November, the Kurds didn't reach export levels of 250,000 barrels a day, as agreed with Baghdad.

The Kurds want the budget to include some IQD4.2 trillion Iraqi dinars as payments due to oil companies working in the Kurdish region. The Kurds said this amount would cover retroactive payments from 2010 up to 2013.

Meanwhile, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's bloc in parliament, the State of the Law, is arguing that the Kurds should first pay for the 250,000 barrels a day they have failed to export from November up to now, Mr. al-Mutlaq said.

The central government in Baghdad has made one payment to companies, but Iraqi officials said last year that they wouldn't pay oil firms a second portion because the Kurdistan Regional Government has failed to reach agreed production under an agreement reached in September.

The KRG further annoyed Baghdad when it started unilateral exports of more than 15,000 barrels a day of oil and condensate via trucks to Turkey at the beginning of January and pledged to increase them gradually. The Kurds also plan to set up their own export pipeline away from the Baghdad-controlled one.

Baghdad paid some IQD650 billion last year to companies but decided to suspend payment of another portion of IQD350 billion because the Kurds suspended exports.

The KRG and Baghdad are locked in a dispute over who should control oil in the Kurdistan region. Baghdad considers scores of oil deals signed with companies, such as Exxon Mobil Corp., Total SA, Gazprom Neft, DNO International ASA and Genel Energy PLC, as null and void because they haven't been approved by the central government, while the Kurds argue that they are legal according to the new constitution.

Copyright (c) 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Sunday, March 3, 2013

Man Working at Carroll Site Crushes Hand

A worker on the Harvey oil-well site on Buttercup Road in Washington Township was injured Tuesday morning when his hand became caught in the main controls for the rig.

Carroll County Sheriff Dale Williams said his office received the call for assistance at 11:22 a.m. and his deputies responded, as well as Fox Township, Carroll County and Carrollton Village fire departments.

Williams said the man's hand was crushed and a piece of metal impaled his hand.

Williams said the injuries were not life-threatening and the main was transported by ambulance to a Canton hospital.

Copyright 2013 The Times Reporter Distributed by Newsbank, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Saturday, March 2, 2013

Man Working at Carroll Site Crushes Hand

A worker on the Harvey oil-well site on Buttercup Road in Washington Township was injured Tuesday morning when his hand became caught in the main controls for the rig.

Carroll County Sheriff Dale Williams said his office received the call for assistance at 11:22 a.m. and his deputies responded, as well as Fox Township, Carroll County and Carrollton Village fire departments.

Williams said the man's hand was crushed and a piece of metal impaled his hand.

Williams said the injuries were not life-threatening and the main was transported by ambulance to a Canton hospital.

Copyright 2013 The Times Reporter Distributed by Newsbank, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Apr 25, Hi i`am Patrick looking for a job working on a oil rig.

by Patrick
(South Africa)

Hi i`am Patrick looking for a job working on a oil rig.I do a cours in ship crane with a capacity of 60000.I do all the test druc test /eyes and body fitness test instructor reg N9612/203/763 AND I DONT DO DRUCS/OR DRINK ALCOHOL.11Years as a crans operator.
My email is patcloete@gmail.com or cloete.patrick@yahoo.com

Click here to post comments.

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How?
Simply click here to return to Rig Crane Operators.



View the original article here

Apr 25, Hi i`am Patrick looking for a job working on a oil rig.

by Patrick
(South Africa)

Hi i`am Patrick looking for a job working on a oil rig.I do a cours in ship crane with a capacity of 60000.I do all the test druc test /eyes and body fitness test instructor reg N9612/203/763 AND I DONT DO DRUCS/OR DRINK ALCOHOL.11Years as a crans operator.
My email is patcloete@gmail.com or cloete.patrick@yahoo.com

Click here to post comments.

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How?
Simply click here to return to Rig Crane Operators.



View the original article here

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Working Through the Tax Hike Spin

With the U.S. Senate getting ready to debate proposals that would raise taxes on American energy companies, the White House blog spins:

"Instead of subsidizing the fossil fuels of the last century by giving away $4 billion of taxpayer money each year to oil companies that are more profitable than ever, we should be investing in a clean energy future—especially when gas prices are high and drivers, whose budgets are already stretched thin, are feeling the pain at the pump."

In reverse order, taking on the White House’s points:

Yesterday’s energy – We thought the administration had shelved this rhetoric, but it’s back – despite government data showing that oil and natural gas not only is today’s energy, it’s tomorrow’s as well. According to the Energy Information Administration more than 55 percent of our energy will be supplied by oil and gas in 2035.

Subsidies/taxpayer money giveaways – Here the blog is inaccurate, and it matters. The oil and natural gas industry receives zero targeted subsidies from government, period. It uses tax deductions generally available to U.S. business. A deduction is not a subsidy. See here, and here.

API Tax Policy Manager Stephen Comstock, who spoke with reporters on a conference call Monday:

“Some bad ideas never seem to go away, which may explain why the U.S. Senate is again scheduled to vote on a proposal to single out the U.S. oil and natural gas industry for billions of dollars in tax increases.  And some are even suggesting that repealing ordinary business tax provisions for our industry is part of the answer to high gasoline prices. Let’s be clear: This proposal is not about addressing gasoline prices.  Higher taxes will not result in lower fuel prices.  In fact, a recent Congressional Research Service analysis concludes that actions like this could increase fuel prices.”

Whether the president believes the CRS isn’t as important, politically, as this: The American people believe it – 76 percent telling a recent Harris Interactive survey that they think raising taxes on oil and natural gas companies could end up costing them more at the pump.

More from Comstock:

“Other supporters of this proposal will point at company profits and claim that their proposal will ensure our industry ‘pays its fair share.’  Singling out five companies for higher taxes is not about fairness.  When did being profitable become a dirty word?  The owners of those companies – the people who benefit from those profits – are the people who own shares in those companies, in their 401(k)s, IRAs, pension plans and other accounts.”

Energy tax facts cited by Comstock:

The oil and natural gas industry delivers $86 million a day to the U.S. treasury in taxes, rental payments, royalties and other production fees – more than $30 billion a year. More is delivered to state and local governments.The industry pays more in taxes than any other industry, and its effective tax rate is substantially higher than the average for the other S&P Industrials – 41 percent versus 26 percent.A study by Wood Mackenzie found that the right policies in place, allowing the industry to produce more oil and natural gas at home, could increase cumulative government revenue by $150 billion by 2025. Comstock:

“Had those policies been in place over the last few years, it would already be reflected in additional government revenues.  We would not have lost an estimated $5 billion from slower development in the Gulf of Mexico, for example.”

Raising taxes, Comstock said, would show an initial rise in government revenues, which would fall after about five years, and 20 years from now the country could face a cumulative $65 billion shortfall. There could be lost jobs and energy production in less than 10 years.

There’s a better idea: Let America’s oil and natural gas companies find and develop more American energy. Comstock:

“There’s a simple answer to getting more government revenue from the oil and natural gas industry – allow us to produce more of the energy our nation and our economy will need for decades to come right here at home.  Not only will this create jobs and generate government revenue, it will send a strong signal to energy markets that could put downward pressure on fuel prices.”


View the original article here

Monday, April 2, 2012

Working Through the Tax Hike Spin

With the U.S. Senate getting ready to debate proposals that would raise taxes on American energy companies, the White House blog spins:
"Instead of subsidizing the fossil fuels of the last century by giving away $4 billion of taxpayer money each year to oil companies that are more profitable than ever, we should be investing in a clean energy future—especially when gas prices are high and drivers, whose budgets are already stretched thin, are feeling the pain at the pump."
In reverse order, taking on the White House’s points:
Yesterday’s energy – We thought the administration had shelved this rhetoric, but it’s back – despite government data showing that oil and natural gas not only is today’s energy, it’s tomorrow’s as well. According to the Energy Information Administration more than 55 percent of our energy will be supplied by oil and gas in 2035.
Subsidies/taxpayer money giveaways – Here the blog is inaccurate, and it matters. The oil and natural gas industry receives zero targeted subsidies from government, period. It uses tax deductions generally available to U.S. business. A deduction is not a subsidy. See here, and here.
API Tax Policy Manager Stephen Comstock, who spoke with reporters on a conference call Monday:
“Some bad ideas never seem to go away, which may explain why the U.S. Senate is again scheduled to vote on a proposal to single out the U.S. oil and natural gas industry for billions of dollars in tax increases.  And some are even suggesting that repealing ordinary business tax provisions for our industry is part of the answer to high gasoline prices. Let’s be clear: This proposal is not about addressing gasoline prices.  Higher taxes will not result in lower fuel prices.  In fact, a recent Congressional Research Service analysis concludes that actions like this could increase fuel prices.”
Whether the president believes the CRS isn’t as important, politically, as this: The American people believe it – 76 percent telling a recent Harris Interactive survey that they think raising taxes on oil and natural gas companies could end up costing them more at the pump.
More from Comstock:
“Other supporters of this proposal will point at company profits and claim that their proposal will ensure our industry ‘pays its fair share.’  Singling out five companies for higher taxes is not about fairness.  When did being profitable become a dirty word?  The owners of those companies – the people who benefit from those profits – are the people who own shares in those companies, in their 401(k)s, IRAs, pension plans and other accounts.”
Energy tax facts cited by Comstock:
The oil and natural gas industry delivers $86 million a day to the U.S. treasury in taxes, rental payments, royalties and other production fees – more than $30 billion a year. More is delivered to state and local governments.The industry pays more in taxes than any other industry, and its effective tax rate is substantially higher than the average for the other S&P Industrials – 41 percent versus 26 percent.A study by Wood Mackenzie found that the right policies in place, allowing the industry to produce more oil and natural gas at home, could increase cumulative government revenue by $150 billion by 2025. Comstock:
“Had those policies been in place over the last few years, it would already be reflected in additional government revenues.  We would not have lost an estimated $5 billion from slower development in the Gulf of Mexico, for example.”
Raising taxes, Comstock said, would show an initial rise in government revenues, which would fall after about five years, and 20 years from now the country could face a cumulative $65 billion shortfall. There could be lost jobs and energy production in less than 10 years.
There’s a better idea: Let America’s oil and natural gas companies find and develop more American energy. Comstock:
“There’s a simple answer to getting more government revenue from the oil and natural gas industry – allow us to produce more of the energy our nation and our economy will need for decades to come right here at home.  Not only will this create jobs and generate government revenue, it will send a strong signal to energy markets that could put downward pressure on fuel prices.”
View the original article here