Monday, February 4, 2013

U.S. Must Remain Active to Ensure Middle East Energy Supplies

The United States must continue its activist role, diplomatically and potentially militarily, in the Middle East, to ensure a free flow of oil and natural gas from the region, former U.S. Ambassador to Iraq James Jeffrey said Sunday on Platts Energy Week, an all-energy news and talk show program.

"The region keeps erupting into one kind or another of violence or instability," Jeffrey said on the program. "So we have to be present."

Currently a visiting fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Jeffrey was U.S. ambassador to Iraq from 2010 until June 2012 and was U.S. ambassador to Turkey for two years before that.

Jeffrey acknowledged that the current U.S. presence in the Middle East is "adequate."

"We have a strong presence in the Gulf," Jeffrey said. "We have good relations with most of the countries in the region. But even with the pivot to Asia, this is something we have to be very careful about," he said, referring to the Obama administration's 2012 East Asia strategy.

"Oil is fungible," Jeffrey said. "There is one international oil market. Prices go up because of shortages in one area, they are going to go up in every other area, even in the United States, even if we import from safer areas or produce it ourselves.

"Even more importantly, at the very core of America's security relationship since World War II has been guaranteeing supplies of oil and gas to our friends and allies. Even if we are independent in energy, most of our friends in East Asia and certainly in Europe, and elsewhere in the world are not. If we want a stable world, if we want a world that isn't overrun by terrorists and enemies for freedom, we need to be present and we need in ensure that this gas and oil keeps flowing."

Discussing Iraq, Jeffrey said while that country has boosted its crude production to 3.4 million barrels per day (b/d) in December and is on target for 3.7 million b/d this year, earlier stated Iraqis hopes for reaching about 12 million b/d production over the next 20 years are not realistic.

"In fact, the Iraqis themselves are now negotiating to ratchet that down to the 8-9 million b/d, which would be right behind Saudi Arabia, still the second-most important oil exporter in the world," he said.

"The problem," Jeffrey said, "is that Iraq itself is not completely stable and it is anchored between two greatly unstable countries: Syria, which is under total civil war at this point, and Iran, which is under international sanctions and facing possible military action of the nuclear question. And Iraq itself has problems between the Kurds in the north and the central government. Oil companies from all over the world are flocking into northern Iraq because there are extraordinary reserves of oil and gas up there."

Chevron last week signed its third oil deal with the Iraqi Kurdish Regional Government, while ExxonMobil, Total, Gazprom Neft and other international oil companies have reached similar agreements. Iraq's central government considers all of them illegal.

"The U.S. has been very active trying to work out arrangements where everybody cooperates and oil and eventually gas from the north is exported in cooperation with Baghdad," Jeffrey said. "The latest deal has fallen through. People are back arguing and more needs to be done to ensure that a solution satisfactory to everybody can be achieved. Because this involves military as well as energy politics."

But despite much public rhetoric by both the central government and the Kurds, the two sides have cooperated on the shipment of oil when it benefits them, Jeffery said.

"Everybody is playing a veiled as well as open game here. I can’t give specific advice," he said. "This is a sensitive issue. A great deal is at stake, not only in energy, but in the political stability of Iraq, where we lost so many people, and therefore, I know the U.S. government is very energetically engaged in trying to find a solution. "

An advisor on Iran at State Department and White House during George W. Bush Administration, Jeffrey was adamant that U.S. and European Union sanctions over its nuclear program have been "extremely effective" against Iran.

"They've cut Iran's exports by more than 50%," he said. "But because oil markets are extremely flexible, including Iraq with its surge in exports, we've been able to balance that out globally and thus the sanctions have been able to tighten the screws on Iran without impacting world energy markets.

"Iran will be under much more pressure to go to the table, but this requires several things," Jeffrey said. "First of all, an offer that they would find acceptable in terms of ending their enrichment to at least 20%. Secondly, they would have to be persuaded that if they do not go down this route, military action will follow, and they may not be persuaded of that yet."

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

API Launches Oil Spill Research Website

American Petroleum Institute (API) Director of Marine and Security Issues Robin Rorick announced Tuesday the launch of www.ioscproceedings.com, a new website that hosts research papers presented every three years at the International Oil Spill Conference (IOSC). The site will enable greater sharing of best practices and latest technologies among industry, government and other stakeholders, as well as promote safe operations around the world.

"Safety is the oil and gas industry’s number one priority," said Rorick."The IOSC Proceedings represent more than 40 years of research into oil spill prevention, response and restoration. Putting this treasure trove of information online makes the latest information, data and research available in the widest possible manner."

First held in 1969, the IOSC provides an open public forum for professionals from the international community, the private sector, government, and non-governmental organizations to highlight and discuss innovations and best practices across the spectrum of prevention, preparedness, response and restoration. Peer-reviewed papers presented at each conference are then published in the IOSC Proceedings. Online for the first time ever, this new database provides free access to more than 3,000 articles containing information and perspectives available nowhere else.

Permanent sponsors of the triennial IOSC include API, the U.S. Coast Guard, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement.

Post a Comment Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Aker Buys Scottish Well Control Specialist

Aker Solutions announced Tuesday that it has agreed to buy a majority stake in Aberdeen-based subsea well control specialist Enovate Systems.

Enovate, which was founded in 2002 and now employs 62 people, has developed a range of patented components and products for use in open water workover systems, in riser workover systems, rigless intervention systems and drilling safety systems. In 2012, it had revenues of approximately $23.6 million (GBP 15 million), with an EBITDA profit of $7.8 million (GBP 5 million).

"Enovate has developed and qualified unique technology for safe and efficient well control. Components from Enovate are also important building blocks for systems within workover and well-intervention services for high pressure and ultra-deep water fields worldwide," Aker Chief Technology Officer Åsmund Bøe commented in a statement.

Aker added that Enovate will continue to be developed as an independent supplier of well control components.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Poland Stumbles as Shale Gas Industry Fails to Take Off

Editor's note: This is the second in a series of stories "Poland to Pennsylvania: An international reporting project underwritten by Calkins Media and the Pulitzer Center." To see all the stories, go to http://www.shalereporter.com/projects/pulitzer/)

WARSAW - A map of Poland, unevenly colored in shades of yellow, brown, green and purple, like a half-finished jigsaw puzzle, hangs prominently on the walls of the country's ministries, state agencies and corporations. Official visitors are cordially invited to take a closer look.

The label in the upper right-hand corner of this new map reads, "Map of Concessions for Hydrocarbon Exploration and Production."

Poland, which last century was the target of foreign armies shaping the region's political history, today is being divided up by a hydrocarbon fever that the Polish government has energetically encouraged. Hoping to reproduce the recent "energy revolution" brought about in the United States by the advent of fracking and other drilling technologies, the Polish government has spearheaded shale gas exploration in Europe in the hopes that one day it will have its own dynamic natural gas industry.

"Shale gas exploration and extraction is a priority for our government, and that's the reason we've decided to focus the investment energy of many companies," says Mikolaj Budzanowski, Poland's treasury minister, supervising the country's state-owned oil and gas enterprises.

So far, 111 exploration concessions have been awarded to about 30 companies, both state-owned and international, on a territory of more than 35,000 square miles - nearly a third of the country.

Despite the enormous infusion of capital and promises that production could start as early as 2015, however, Poland's gas industry has yet to take off. Hampered by difficult geology, a paltry service sector, a lack of adequate infrastructure, as well as an uncertain regulatory and tax environment, there have been few exploratory wells drilled.

That, in turn, has delayed assessment of the actual size of reserves and left in doubt whether the industry could ever be commercially viable.

In 2011, the U.S. Energy Information Administration published an enormous figure - 5.3 trillion cubic meters of gas - in estimating the natural gas reserves in Poland, which generated the initial burst of political and investment enthusiasm. Then in 2012, the Polish Geological Institute together with the U.S. Geological Survey, using stricter methodology, decreased those figures by a factor of 10.

"You can say that the basin in Poland has historical data that is on the edge of being good or bad. Depending on how strict you are, you can make it easily negative or expand it easily to a bigger number," says Pawel Poprawa, one of the first Polish geologists to start working on the shale gas issue, as far back as 2005, and a co-author of the Polish Geological Institute report.

According to Poprawa and many other experts in the field, the only way to arrive at a more realistic estimate of Poland's gas potential is to do exploratory drillings, lots of them. All other reports are simply "first guess."

"We're very optimistic and we think there's real potential here in Poland, although we have to drill a lot more wells before we feel confident for development," says John Buggenhagen, exploration manager of London-based San Leon Energy, which bills itself as Europe's largest shale gas company by acreage and holds the second largest number of concessions in Poland after the government.

"One of the things we do in North America that isn't done anywhere else in the world is that we drill, drill, drill, drill, drill," he said.

"And the way to find hydrocarbons is to drill."

But it is exactly the sheer scale of drilling required that may prove impossible for Poland. Unlike conventional gas, shale gas development needs a much larger number of wells, a substantial portion of which will contribute almost no production.

Only a few of them, rich in natural gas liquids or tapping the so-called "sweet spots," could prove commercially viable, and the decline of production could be rapid, up to 75 percent in the first year, according to the International Energy Agency.

Studies have offered various growth scenarios, but all of them agree that if Poland's shale gas industry is to have a real economic impact, a substantial number of wells would be necessary.

The Kosciuszko Institute, a leading Polish think tank, assumes that Poland would drill an average of 500 wells per year to create 155,000 jobs over a period of 10 years. The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies has calculated 700 to 1,000 drillings per year.

That's wildly more than Poland has drilled. Over a period of three years, only 33 test wells were drilled, with 10 of those hydraulically fractured, out of which just two were horizontally drilled and fracked - the definitive procedure for assessing potential.

Government officials recognize the challenge.

"Whoever was thinking of a direct parallel to the American gas boom is, of course, wrong," said Piotr Wozniak, Poland's chief national geologist and the undersecretary of state at the Ministry of Environment, which is responsible for giving out concessions. "It would be absolutely different. It would develop differently, at a different pace, and the results would be different."

Results have not been encouraging. Exxon Mobil withdrew from Poland in 2012, saying its wells had failed to demonstrate "sustained commercial hydrocarbon flow rates," while ConocoPhillips relinquished its 70 percent option in three concessions in northern Poland, although it retains three more. It has been reported that Canada-based Talisman Energy also has started talks to sell off its Polish exploration licenses.

Meanwhile, with market uncertainty growing, the share price of small independent companies engaged in unconventional gas exploration in Poland has plummeted precipitously, which has forced them to nearly halt operations.

A major challenge has been the price of wells, and drilling services in particular. Although Poland is one of the oldest oil and gas producers in the world - its first oilfield dates back to 1853 - it never managed to develop a competitive market for services. Unlike in the United States, its industry has been dominated by the state monopolist PGNiG and its daughter companies, distorting the economics of the market.

According to European Union statistics, Poland has just 11 drilling rigs available (there are 70 in the whole of Europe), compared to about 2,000 in the United States - a huge impediment to any future large-scale operations.

In addition, Polish shale gas has proved to be on average 1.5 times deeper - some deposits are more than two miles underground - than most formations in America, ramping up costs. All in all, the average price of an exploratory well in Poland, horizontally drilled and hydraulically fractured, comes to about $15 million, compared with just $4 million in the Barnett Shale in Texas.

Even with higher gas prices in Europe, those numbers make the commercial viability questionable.

Industry representatives contend that only economies of scale - much more drilling - will bring costs down. Yet that won't happen without definite proof of available reserves, while available reserves can't be proved without more drilling - a vicious circle.

"Definitely hopes and expectations a year ago were much higher than today," says Cezary Filipowicz, a former vice president at PKN Orlen, the biggest oil refiner in Poland, and currently the business development manager of United Oilfield Services, a new service company that has raised $150 million for state-of-the-art equipment, including seismic trucks, a fracturing fleet, and one drilling rig.

"I'm not sure what will happen next year and how many wells will be drilled," Filipowicz said. "If there are again a dozen or so and we use 10 percent of our capacity, it doesn't make sense in the long term. Nobody would risk investment in equipment without a market for services."

Tomasz Chmal, an energy analyst with the Sobieski Institute, a Polish think tank, urges patience.

"It's too early to judge. Let the business people decide, not politicians," he said. "The price of the technology is going down. It may not be economical this year or next year, but it might be economical in the years to come."

That possibility faces another hurdle: The government has made plans to introduce a new hydrocarbon law that would give the state a minority stake in each concession and would, reportedly, raise taxes to around 40 percent of gross profits.

The idea, according to Wozniak, the country's chief geologist, is to have legislation comparable to that in Norway, Denmark and the Netherlands.

Private operators contend that any comparisons to Norway and Denmark, major producers of conventional gas, are unwarranted, as shale gas resources in Poland are still a matter of speculation, and investment is much riskier.

"We haven't even proved if there's a commercial hydrocarbon industry beyond what has already been found and the government is already talking about that they're the North Sea and they're going to have all this production and they're going to raise taxes," says Buggenhagen of San Leon Energy. "People are just going to leave."

Dimiter Kenarov is a freelance journalist based in Istanbul, Turkey, and a contributing editor at the Virginia Quarterly Review. His work has also appeared in Esquire, Outside, The Nation, the International Herald Tribune, and others, and has been twice anthologized in "The Best American Travel Writing."

He is currently working on a book-length project about the Black Sea.

Copyright 2013 Herald-Standard (Uniontown PA)Distributed by Newsbank, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Marathon Names Stover to New VP Role

Marathon Oil Corporation (MRO) announced Tuesday that Michael J. Stover, currently manager of the company's mid-continent production operations, has been appointed to the newly established position of vice president, Operations Services effective Feb. 1, 2013. In this role, Stover will have oversight responsibility for Marathon Oil's Upstream Development, Technology, Technical Excellence, Global Procurement, Land and Commercial Services, and Drilling and Completions activities. Stover will be based in Houston and report to Marathon Oil Corporation chairman, president and CEO Clarence P. Cazalot Jr.

"Establishing this new position and capturing the increased organizational alignment associated with it is consistent with our ongoing drive to achieve greater efficiencies throughout Marathon Oil," said Cazalot. "Mike possesses a strong blend of operations, technical and planning experience and expertise that will play an important role in our ability to further optimize the contributions of these key services to our continued success."

Stover earned a Bachelor of Science degree in petroleum and natural gas engineering from Pennsylvania State University in 1986. He joined Marathon Oil that same year, initially as a roustabout, followed by operations and reservoir engineering assignments for the Yates Field located in West Texas. In 1991, he transferred to the Company's international group in Houston and was responsible for reservoir and economic studies for fields in Ireland, Tunisia, and Norway. From 1995 thru 2000, Stover was located in Anchorage, Alaska, where he worked both development and exploration projects associated with Marathon Oil's operations on the Kenai Peninsula.

In 2000, he joined Marathon Oil's Corporate Strategic Planning group in Houston. In this assignment, his responsibilities included business planning and corporate portfolio modeling to support the reorganization of USX Corporation that lead to the establishment of Marathon Oil Corporation as a standalone company.

Following that assignment Stover relocated to Aberdeen, Scotland, where he held the position of European Business Unit Subsurface and Business Planning Manager. In 2005, he relocated to Houston where assumed the role of East Texas/North Louisiana Asset Manager. In 2006, his area of responsibility was expanded to include Marathon Oil's Oklahoma oil and gas properties.

In 2009, he assumed the position of Director of Central Evaluation and Financial Planning. In this role, Stover was responsible for providing financial and portfolio analysis across the business enterprise. In late 2011, he assumed his current role of Mid-Continent Asset Manager with responsibility for Marathon Oil's assets and operations in Oklahoma, East Texas, North Louisiana and Colorado.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

U.S. Will Remain Largest Source of New Oil Growth in 2013

Topping the list of the big oil and gas stories in 2012 was the dramatic surge in U.S. oil production. In 2013, the U.S. will remain the largest source of new oil growth worldwide aided by the shale boom, but surpassing Saudi Arabia as the globe’s top oil producer by 2020 will be a challenge.

The big turnaround of U.S. oil production brought by new light tight oil developments was fully recognized in 2012, putting to rest the long-held notion that domestic oil production was in terminal decline. The rise in domestic oil output and the expectation that U.S. oil development will continue to grow amid high oil prices prompted some market observers to predict the U.S. could become the world’s largest oil producer, upstaging Saudi Arabia, by 2020.

But while U.S. oil output growth is expected to continue to be strong, it’s going to be hard to rival Saudi Arabia. U.S. oil production comes at an extremely high cost. Some anticipated increases in domestic oil production may not materialize if crude prices decline below $80 a barrel.

"Whether the U.S. will become the world’s top producer is not the most important thing to focus on," said Marcela Donadio, Americas Oil and Gas Leader for the global Ernst & Young organization. "What matters is the dramatic reversal of the U.S. energy fortunes and the need for the U.S. to take significant steps to ensure oil supply growth continues. Coherent energy policy, access to resources, improved infrastructure and economic stability are all key to future success."

Oil

In 2013, the global oil supply-demand balance is expected to remain uneasy amid geopolitical tensions and economic uncertainty. Oil markets could face an ugly Arab winter given the unstable political environments in Syria, Egypt and Libya. Meanwhile, Iraqi production continues to grow, currently topping 3 million barrels of oil a day, taking the No. 2 spot among OPEC producers from Iran. The Iraqi increases put significant pressure on OPEC members to cut back their production in order to make room for Iraq’s new output.

The long overdue, super-giant Kashagan project offshore Kazakhstan is expected to start production by mid-year and contribute to the rising global oil supplies from non-OPEC sources.

In the U.S., despite a substantial build-out of the oil transportation infrastructure this year, bottlenecks in the Midwest are expected to continue the pressure on US and Canadian oil prices.

Gas

Last year, U.S. natural gas prices averaged below $3/MMBtu for the first time since the late 1990s amid a glut of production, leaving many if not most natural gas producers in a bind. Small gas producers are expected to continue struggling this year with questions remaining about their ability to survive. Low natural gas prices, however, will continue driving a renaissance in the U.S. petrochemical and manufacturing sectors as they lower feedstock costs. U.S. natural gas exports will remain a controversial issue this year as supporters and adversaries escalate political tensions around how much exports could impact domestic natural gas prices.

Downstream

Profit margins for the U.S. refining business were up across the board in 2012, with Midwest refineries having another stellar year thanks to access to cheaper WTI and Canadian crudes. While expected to diminish somewhat, the structural imbalances in the U.S. Midcontinent are expected to continue this year, prolonging the advantage of regional refiners that have access to cheaper oil supplies.

Globally, refiners had a good year in 2012, but their performance was nowhere near the profitability seen in the U.S. Going forward, the consensus view is that the economics for refiners outside the U.S. will remain challenging as more refining capacity comes online and plants continue to process relatively more expensive crudes.

Oilfield services

Last year was not a bad year for oilfield services companies as rig counts held up and global upstream spending cautiously increased. The U.S. rig count was slightly off as gas-directed drilling slowed and was not fully offset by new oil- and liquids-directed drilling. Oilfield service cost pressures slowed somewhat due to efficiency gains, while labor pressures rose. Offshore, there still are a large number of new-builds coming into the market, that are expected to keep a lid on day rates, utilization and profit margins.

Transactions

Annual transaction activity in terms of total reported deal value was up 20 percent in 2012 compared with a year earlier, topping $400 billion, the highest ever reported value. However, activity in terms of deal volume or the number of deals was down slightly for the year. A full $60 billion of the total transaction value involved Russia’s oil giant Rosneft, which struck deals with AAR and BP for the TNK-BP joint venture. Asian outbound oil and gas acquisitions had another strong year in 2012, and the acquisition pace looks to continue in 2013.

Post a Comment Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

UPI Appoints Banks as Manager of GeoPlane Services

UniversalPegasus International said Tuesday that it has has appointed Wellington Banks as Manager of GeoPlane Services.GeoPlane Services has been an industry leader for more than 20 years providing GPS Rentals, Sales and Repairs for a comprehensive suite of Trimble Navigation products to the energy, environmental, survey, mapping and construction industries.Under Banks' leadership, GeoPlane Services plans to expand and enhance industry support by investing in the latest Trimble equipment; enhancing hardware and software technical support with access to licensed professional surveyors, professional engineers and GIS personnel; expanding the Certified Repair Center for Mapping and Survey Equipment; offering specialized certified Survey and Mapping GPS training; and offering customized application support.Banks has more than 30 years of experience in the GPS industry with equipment manufacturing and repairs; survey and mapping service providers; and training and support programs for data collection and processing. As a Geodesist with a Master's degree in Geodesy and Geodetic Sciences from Ohio State University, Banks has field experience in mapping pipeline systems, performing subsidence studies and establishing geodetic controls and survey networks across the varied terrains of North America. As a respected industry leader, he has provided his expertise to maintain and evolve GPS Processing and Satellite Orbit Determination software in cooperation with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Earth Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences."Under Wellington’s management, we aim to expand and enhance GeoPlane Services’ capabilities," said UPI's CEO, Philip Luna. "As an accomplished professional, his experiences in the industry will support and encourage our efforts to do this. I am thrilled to have Wellington join the UPI team."Post a Comment Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.
Please enable Javascript to view this content.

View the original article here

Dana to Move Forward with Nefertiti Development

Dana Petroleum has been given the go-ahead by the Egyptian government to further develop the Nefertiti oil field in the Gulf of Suez following the successful completion of an appraisal well.

The Aberdeen-based oil and gas company, in partnership with INPEX, successfully drilled the exploration well Nefertiti-2X at the end of 2012. The well tested at a maximum stabilised flow rate of 1,850 barrels per day (b/d) with an Electrical Submersible Pump (ESP), and the field is expected to produce around 2,500 b/d (1,625 b/d net to Dana) when it comes on stream in around six months.

Following the successful appraisal, the two companies agreed with the Egyptian General Petroleum Company on Nov. 7, 2012 that the Nefertiti field was a commercial field. Eng. Osama Kamal, Minister of Petroleum and Mineral Resources, approved the lease on Jan. 20, 2013.

Dana’s Managing Director in Egypt Nick Dancer said, "The Nefertiti field is a first for Dana in that it is an offshore field that we have explored by drilling extended reach wells from an onshore location. Whilst increasing the complexity of the wells, it reduces the drilling and subsequent development costs and reduces development time as well as protecting the offshore environment including a number of coral reefs. I’m delighted we’ve been given the green light to progress the development, and also undertake further drilling in the area to test a different play concept in the Nefertiti Field."

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Brazil Oil Workers to Stage 24-Hour Warning Strike Monday--Union

RIO DE JANEIRO--A union representing oil workers at Brazil's state-run energy company Petroleo Brasileiro (PBR, PETR4.BR), or Petrobras, said late Friday that workers will stage a 24-hour "warning" strike to protest the company's latest profit-sharing offer, although crude oil output is not expected to be affected.

The National Federation of Oil Workers, or FNP, said its members voted to approve the strike this week. The FNP is an umbrella union representing about half of Petrobras's 80,000 employees. Workers at a sister umbrella union known as the Brazilian Oil Workers Federation, or FUP, will also participate in the strike.

Workers are protesting Petrobras's initial profit-sharing proposal made in December, which was less than half the payment oil workers received last year, said Eduardo Henrique Soares da Costa, a director for the FNP. "This is a 24-hour warning strike to add a little pressure to the negotiations and let Petrobras know that it needs to improve its offer," Mr. da Costa said.

Oil workers will decline to change shifts and halt services at installations across the country, but Mr. da Costa said that production will not be affected by the work action.

Strikes such as the one planned for Monday typically involve slowdowns and work-to-rule actions that have limited affect on Petrobras's operations because of their short duration. The work action, however, comes as Petrobras struggles to boost crude-oil output amid ongoing maintenance at offshore platforms. Petrobras faced a similar 24-hour strike in September during salary negotiations.

Petrobras said it was taking "all administrative and operational measures" to guarantee normal operations on Monday. "Petrobras continues to be open to negotiations with the unions so that all parties can reach an understanding about [the profit-sharing payment]," the company said in an email.

The last major strike at Petrobras took place in July 2008, when oil workers walked off the job for five days to protest work issues and profit-sharing proposals. The strike cost Petrobras about 63,000 barrels of crude oil production per day.

Copyright (c) 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

PetroNova Updates Llanos Basin Drilling Program

PetroNova on Friday provided an update on its Guasco-1 exploratory well located on the CPO-13 Block, in which PetroNova has 20 percent working interest, in Colombia's Llanos Basin.

The Guasco-1 exploration well was spud on Jan. 8, 2013 and reached a total depth of 3,114 feet on Jan. 15, 2013 . The well found poor sand development in the Upper Carbonera Basal section, which was the primary target; however, mud log and petrophysical interpretation indicated a potential prospective zone in the C5 sands. The 2,711 to 2,717 foot interval was perforated and tested, and yielded 100 per cent basic sediment and water. The operator is presently abandoning the well.

PetroNova will continue its drilling campaign and plans to move the rig to the Cayabana prospect in CPO-07.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here