Friday, May 3, 2013

SandRidge Agrees to Either Fire CEO or Give TPG-Axon Control of Board

SandRidge Agrees to Either Fire CEO or Give TPG-Axon Control of Board

SandRidge Energy Inc. agreed to fire its chief executive or give control of its board to an activist shareholder, settling a closely watched proxy battle amid an outbreak of investor unrest in the oil patch.

SandRidge, an oil-and-gas producer with a stock-market value of about $3 billion, immediately appointed four directors to its board who were nominated by hedge fund TPG-Axon Capital Management LP, which owns 7.3% of its shares.

The company, which is based in Oklahoma City, Okla., said Wednesday that it would review its strategy, costs and certain transactions with entities controlled by relatives of Tom Ward, its chairman and chief executive. The company also cut directors' annual pay to $250,000 from $375,000.

Mr. Ward's prospects of retaining his job appeared to dim. SandRidge said it would decide whether to fire him by the end of June; if he remains, three incumbent directors would resign and TPG-Axon would get another seat on the board, giving the hedge fund, which has repeatedly called for Mr. Ward's ouster, majority representation.

"We believe these actions open a new chapter for SandRidge," its lead independent director, Jeffrey Serota, said in a statement.

A SandRidge spokesman said Mr. Ward had no comment.

In what SandRidge said was a separate development, Matthew Grubb, its president and chief operating officer, said he would resign.

The company's shares jumped sharply late Wednesday afternoon, but ended 4 p.m. EDT trading on the New York Stock Exchange little changed at $5.85, up two cents.

Dinakar Singh, TPG-Axon's founder, said, "We all believe that SandRidge has tremendous asset value, and we expect that the company will relentlessly focus on growing and realizing that value through a particular focus on execution and efficiency."

"Score one for the activists," said Mark Hanson, a Morningstar Inc. analyst.

TPG-Axon and another large shareholder, Mount Kellett Capital Management LP, have questioned SandRidge's transactions with entities controlled by Mr. Ward and his family. SandRidge said Wednesday that a board review of the transactions hadn't found any improper conduct by Mr. Ward, but that it would examine the issue further with the help of a law firm.

The proxy battle is the latest case of a shareholder shaking up the board of an energy-industry company, as activists demand better stock performance and more-generous dividends from laggards. In January, Chesapeake Energy Corp. Chief Executive Aubrey McClendon agreed to step down by April after the company's biggest shareholders took control of the board.

Hess Corp. is tussling with hedge fund Elliott Management Corp., which is opposing the company-backed directors who are up for election with its own slate.

Investor Carl Icahn, who agitated for change at Chesapeake, is now demanding that offshore driller Transocean Ltd. increase its dividend to $4 a share, up from the $2.24 the company plans to pay.

TPG-Axon took aim at SandRidge in November, pointing to poor stock performance and rich executive pay. It also demanded the ouster of Mr. Ward, who founded the company in 2006 after leaving Chesapeake, which he co-founded with Mr. McClendon in 1989.

Copyright (c) 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Bangladesh: Need to Involve More IOCs in Gas Hunt

The government is reportedly considering a hike in gas price to be produced from new offshore blocks. This move comes following the demand made by the prospective bidders among the international oil companies (IOCs) for the country's off-shore blocks.

Some such prospective bidders consider the current price as being 'low'.

A pre-bid meeting for the offshore blocks was arranged in the city early last month by the government after much foot-dragging. In the meeting, the IOCs, according to reports, sought higher prices for output of gas from Bangladesh's new offshore blocks in the Bay of Bengal, in the event of its discovery there. The gas price offered under the model production sharing contract (MPSC) offshore bidding round, as their argument in favor of such a hike in the price of gas indicated, was not attractive and below the internationally accepted level.

Under the MPSC of the just-opened 2012 offshore bidding round, the gas price was pegged to high sulfur fuel oil prices, with the floor price for HSFO (high sulfur fuel oil) being fixed at US$ 100 per tonne and the ceiling price, at $200 per tonne. On the basis of this, Petrobangla proposed a 10 per cent hike in gas price and sought the approval of the ministry of energy & power.

Many noted IOCs participated in the pre-bid meeting. Petrobangla declared the bidding round open on December 9, 2012, and the deadline for bid submissions was fixed at March 18, 2013. It has put on offer a total of 12 dispute-free oil and gas blocks - nine in shallow waters and three in deep waters - under the country's fourth round of bidding. Under the latest bidding round, export of gas has been prohibited. The IOCs will be able to sell the gas produced directly to third parties in the domestic market, without going through Petrobangla, but the latter will have the first right of refusal.

As the deadline for bid submission is nearing, it is yet to be ascertained as to how many IOCs will take part in the bid. This all-important bid was postponed or cancelled several times due to procedural delays and bureaucratic tangles. In fact, the internationally well-recognised IOCs were reluctant to come to Bangladesh for oil and gas exploration for dearth of sufficient data about the possibility of their reserves. Those who came earlier were not quite keen about exploration activities in the off-shore areas of Bangladesh, considering particularly their high drilling and exploration costs. Many companies who were awarded the contracts following earlier rounds of bidding, left Bangladesh after a brief stay, selling their stakes to other IOCs.

The country passed the leanest decade of exploration activities, in pursuit of efforts for discovery of new gas reserve, in its history as a consequence of a lackadaisical approach to new exploration activities relating to hydrocarbon resources. During 2001-2010, Bangladesh discovered only one new gas-field - the Tullow-operated Bangura in 2004, with reserves of only around 500 billion cubic feet (Bcf). The Bangura discovery was made six years after the previous discovery of Chevron's Bibiyana gas-field in 1998.

The activities of the IOCs in Bangladesh have not been otherwise noteworthy on any reasonable count. Bangladesh inked the latest production sharing contract (PSC) with the US-based ConocoPhillis in 2011, one decade after the previous signing of PSCs with British Shell Oil and Cairn Energy in 2001. However, the IOCs' share in the country's overall gas production witnessed a five-fold increase, from an average 214 MMcfd in 2001 to 1,087 MMcfd in early 2012.

There is hardly any alternative for Bangladesh to that of offering more contracts to the IOCs to help accelerate the pace of its exploration and drilling activities, particularly in the offshore areas, to ensure the country's future energy security. The state-run entities have neither the financial muscle nor technological capability to do that.

Meanwhile, Bangladesh's neighboring countries have done commendably well about hydrocarbon exploration ventures. Both Myanmar and India have succeeded in discovering large gas fields in their offshore zones in the Bay. Bangladesh remains far behind in this particular area of activities and has thus failed to tap properly the potential of its deep sea hydrocarbon resources in a timely way. Activities in this sector are thus yet to open a new chapter, unlike the cases with its neighbors. A proper utilization plan has not been worked out and only some unplanned activities have so far taken place, mostly on political considerations, as far as Bangladesh is concerned.

Geologists, however, have been hinting at high prospects of striking oil and gas in the Bangladesh territory in the Bay. For lack of effective media coverage, such possibilities still remain as largely 'unknown quantities' to those in the world outside. The government needs to take some prompt actions for disseminating proper information about such potential or prospects. If IOCs could be engaged properly in the offshore exploration drives, reaping some gains expeditiously would have, perhaps, been possible. Even discovery of hydrocarbon resources on a modest scale in the offshore fields may usher in a new era for Bangladesh. As such, no time should be wasted for making a spirited drive for the purpose.

Some conservative estimates put the national demand for gas at around 50,000 MMcf by 2020, in the context of the targeted plus 7.0 per cent growth rate of Bangladesh's gross domestic product (GDP) in order to realize its cherished goal of becoming a middle income country around that time. With that end in view, about 24 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of hydrocarbon resources need to be discovered by 2025. Unless BAPEX makes some major strides for exploring gas in the Netrakona-Sunamganj onshore belt soon, the chances of overcoming the problem of a severe gas shortage within 2014 are quite slim. The Magnama and Hatiya structures have reportedly a substantial volume of gas reserve. This was evident after conducting a 3D survey there.

The country urgently needs massive investments by the IOCs, given the financial and technological constraints of its own state-run firms. Investment worth $25 billion is needed to tap the potential for striking gas in the Bangladesh part of the Bay of Bengal. An extensive exploration drive should start on both the country's onshore and offshore blocks soon by engaging more IOCs. Harnessing gas, in tandem with efforts to help augment power supply capacity, is of crucial importance at this critical time. Availability of energy resources including power supplies will matter most for investment activities, maximizing the utilization of existing production capacity in different sectors and thus accelerating the pace of the country's growth performance in the coming years.

Copyright 2013 The Financial Express All Rights Reserved

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Anadarko Has Talked With Exxon, Shell about Mozambique Gas Stake

Anadarko Petroleum Corp. has held early-stage talks with energy companies Exxon Mobil Corp. and Royal Dutch Shell PLC about selling a share of the U.S. oil firm's massive natural gas discoveries off the coast of Mozambique, a senior government official in the country said Thursday.

The discovery of trillions of cubic feet of natural gas offshore Mozambique by Anadarko and Italy's Eni SpA has piqued the interest of some of the world's leading energy companies, which are keen to get a foothold in an area well placed to serve energy-hungry Asian export markets.

Anadarko, an oil and gas exploration company based outside Houston, has said it wants to sell up to 10% of its share of the energy trove.

"We know of Shell speaking to Anadarko, and of talks with ExxonMobil," said the Mozambique official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. He said, however, that Anadarko's talks with the companies so far hadn't brought firm offers as this would have been communicated to the government.

Anadarko spokesman John Christiansen declined to say which potential buyers Anadarko was talking to.

"We've had a lot of interest from a lot of players--a lot of the majors are very interested," he added.

Exxon spokesman Alan Jeffers said: "We don't comment on potential business opportunities."

Shell declined to comment.

"They don't have to tell us which type of discussions; only when it is at a very, very advanced stage do they come to the government and see if we agree," said the Mozambique official. "We have always said a deal will be acceptable if the buyer satisfies the technical and financial requirements, that is all. It is up to the seller to decide."

While Anadarko and Eni have said they want to retain a share in the finds, both firms have sought out investors to allow them to bank some early profits and defray some of the costs of developing a giant liquefied natural gas plant to cool and ship the gas to Asia.

Eni Thursday announced a deal worth $4.21 billion to sell a 20% stake in its field to Chinese state-owned oil company China National Petroleum Corp.

Although Anadarko and Eni agreed in December to jointly develop an LNG plant, neither has extensive experience with building and operating LNG plants, which can cost up to 10s of billions of dollars. By contrast, Exxon and Shell are two of the world's leading LNG investors and shippers.

"Anadarko wants someone with LNG expertise," said the official.

For Shell, buying into Anadarko's license area would be its second attempt at getting a position in Mozambique. Last year, the Anglo-Dutch energy company was outbid by Thailand's PTT Exploration & Production, which snapped up Anadarko's junior partner in the field, London-listed Cove Energy, for $1.9 billion.

Ben Lefebvre in Houston contributed to this report.

Copyright (c) 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Subsea 7 Says Tendering Levels Remain Strong

International oilfield services firm Subsea 7 said Thursday that levels of tendering remain strong across its markets and that it remains positive about medium and long-term market prospects.

Reporting its fourth quarter results for 2012, Subsea 7 said that despite the strong tender levels delays in project awards and supply chain bottlenecks will temper the firm's rate of progress in 2013. However, it expects both revenue and profit at the EBITDA level to show some progress during the year.

For 2012 Subsea 7 reported a 15-percent increase in its revenue to $6.3 billion, compared with 2011. Adjusted EBITDA for the year came in 13.6-percent greater at $1.1 billion. For 4Q 2012, the firm reported 13.7-percent increase in revenue to $1.6 billion, with EBITDA improving to $270 million (4Q 2011: $227 million).

Subsea 7 warned that its West Africa business will see a period of lower offshore activity in 2013 as operations on SURF (subsea umbilicals, risers and flowlines) contracts awarded in the second half of 2012 and early 2013 are projected to start in 2014.

However, Subsea 7 said that it sees increased tendering in the Gulf of Mexico and strong tendering in both the North Sea and the Norwegian Sea. The firm added that in Brazul demand from Petrobras for flexible pipelay vessels remains strong, while it also recently won its first contract in Mexico – which will require the deployment of its Seven Borealis vessel.

Subsea 7 CEO Jean Cahuzac commented in a statement:

"2012 was another year of significant achievement for Subsea 7. We have delivered strong financial results in line with our expectations. We have built a record backlog, exited non-core businesses and successfully completed the integration process following the Combination in January 2011. Our fleet enhancement program is also on track with the start-up of Seven Borealis in Angola, the ongoing construction of Seven Waves, and the recent order of a new-build diving support vessel for the North Sea.

"Tendering activity increased through the year, in particular in the North Sea, Africa and Brazil, reflecting our clients' ambitious investment plans. We remained disciplined in our bidding approach with a focus on project risk management and profitability, and I am pleased with the quality of our new awards and current level of order in-take."

A former engineer, Jon is an award-winning editor who has covered the technology, engineering and energy sectors since the mid-1990s. Email Jon at jmainwaring@rigzone.com.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Bangladesh: Need to Involve More IOCs in Gas Hunt

The government is reportedly considering a hike in gas price to be produced from new offshore blocks. This move comes following the demand made by the prospective bidders among the international oil companies (IOCs) for the country's off-shore blocks.

Some such prospective bidders consider the current price as being 'low'.

A pre-bid meeting for the offshore blocks was arranged in the city early last month by the government after much foot-dragging. In the meeting, the IOCs, according to reports, sought higher prices for output of gas from Bangladesh's new offshore blocks in the Bay of Bengal, in the event of its discovery there. The gas price offered under the model production sharing contract (MPSC) offshore bidding round, as their argument in favor of such a hike in the price of gas indicated, was not attractive and below the internationally accepted level.

Under the MPSC of the just-opened 2012 offshore bidding round, the gas price was pegged to high sulfur fuel oil prices, with the floor price for HSFO (high sulfur fuel oil) being fixed at US$ 100 per tonne and the ceiling price, at $200 per tonne. On the basis of this, Petrobangla proposed a 10 per cent hike in gas price and sought the approval of the ministry of energy & power.

Many noted IOCs participated in the pre-bid meeting. Petrobangla declared the bidding round open on December 9, 2012, and the deadline for bid submissions was fixed at March 18, 2013. It has put on offer a total of 12 dispute-free oil and gas blocks - nine in shallow waters and three in deep waters - under the country's fourth round of bidding. Under the latest bidding round, export of gas has been prohibited. The IOCs will be able to sell the gas produced directly to third parties in the domestic market, without going through Petrobangla, but the latter will have the first right of refusal.

As the deadline for bid submission is nearing, it is yet to be ascertained as to how many IOCs will take part in the bid. This all-important bid was postponed or cancelled several times due to procedural delays and bureaucratic tangles. In fact, the internationally well-recognised IOCs were reluctant to come to Bangladesh for oil and gas exploration for dearth of sufficient data about the possibility of their reserves. Those who came earlier were not quite keen about exploration activities in the off-shore areas of Bangladesh, considering particularly their high drilling and exploration costs. Many companies who were awarded the contracts following earlier rounds of bidding, left Bangladesh after a brief stay, selling their stakes to other IOCs.

The country passed the leanest decade of exploration activities, in pursuit of efforts for discovery of new gas reserve, in its history as a consequence of a lackadaisical approach to new exploration activities relating to hydrocarbon resources. During 2001-2010, Bangladesh discovered only one new gas-field - the Tullow-operated Bangura in 2004, with reserves of only around 500 billion cubic feet (Bcf). The Bangura discovery was made six years after the previous discovery of Chevron's Bibiyana gas-field in 1998.

The activities of the IOCs in Bangladesh have not been otherwise noteworthy on any reasonable count. Bangladesh inked the latest production sharing contract (PSC) with the US-based ConocoPhillis in 2011, one decade after the previous signing of PSCs with British Shell Oil and Cairn Energy in 2001. However, the IOCs' share in the country's overall gas production witnessed a five-fold increase, from an average 214 MMcfd in 2001 to 1,087 MMcfd in early 2012.

There is hardly any alternative for Bangladesh to that of offering more contracts to the IOCs to help accelerate the pace of its exploration and drilling activities, particularly in the offshore areas, to ensure the country's future energy security. The state-run entities have neither the financial muscle nor technological capability to do that.

Meanwhile, Bangladesh's neighboring countries have done commendably well about hydrocarbon exploration ventures. Both Myanmar and India have succeeded in discovering large gas fields in their offshore zones in the Bay. Bangladesh remains far behind in this particular area of activities and has thus failed to tap properly the potential of its deep sea hydrocarbon resources in a timely way. Activities in this sector are thus yet to open a new chapter, unlike the cases with its neighbors. A proper utilization plan has not been worked out and only some unplanned activities have so far taken place, mostly on political considerations, as far as Bangladesh is concerned.

Geologists, however, have been hinting at high prospects of striking oil and gas in the Bangladesh territory in the Bay. For lack of effective media coverage, such possibilities still remain as largely 'unknown quantities' to those in the world outside. The government needs to take some prompt actions for disseminating proper information about such potential or prospects. If IOCs could be engaged properly in the offshore exploration drives, reaping some gains expeditiously would have, perhaps, been possible. Even discovery of hydrocarbon resources on a modest scale in the offshore fields may usher in a new era for Bangladesh. As such, no time should be wasted for making a spirited drive for the purpose.

Some conservative estimates put the national demand for gas at around 50,000 MMcf by 2020, in the context of the targeted plus 7.0 per cent growth rate of Bangladesh's gross domestic product (GDP) in order to realize its cherished goal of becoming a middle income country around that time. With that end in view, about 24 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of hydrocarbon resources need to be discovered by 2025. Unless BAPEX makes some major strides for exploring gas in the Netrakona-Sunamganj onshore belt soon, the chances of overcoming the problem of a severe gas shortage within 2014 are quite slim. The Magnama and Hatiya structures have reportedly a substantial volume of gas reserve. This was evident after conducting a 3D survey there.

The country urgently needs massive investments by the IOCs, given the financial and technological constraints of its own state-run firms. Investment worth $25 billion is needed to tap the potential for striking gas in the Bangladesh part of the Bay of Bengal. An extensive exploration drive should start on both the country's onshore and offshore blocks soon by engaging more IOCs. Harnessing gas, in tandem with efforts to help augment power supply capacity, is of crucial importance at this critical time. Availability of energy resources including power supplies will matter most for investment activities, maximizing the utilization of existing production capacity in different sectors and thus accelerating the pace of the country's growth performance in the coming years.

Copyright 2013 The Financial Express All Rights Reserved

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Otto Reports Reserves Increase at Galoc Field

Otto Energy Ltd. provided an update on remaining oil reserve balances at the Galoc oil field in the Philippines as at Jan. 1, 2013.

Otto announces updated attributable Galoc oil field 1P Reserves of 3.4 MMstb and 2P Reserves of 4.3 MMstb.Galoc has Reserves Replacement Ratio of 115 percent on the Proved basis and 98 percent on the Proved & Probable basis.Galoc oil field Reserves are expected to maintain production beyond 2020.Otto expects increased production volume from Galoc Phase II in 2H 2013.Galoc is one of three exploration events planned by Otto in CY2013 along with the Duhat-2 well and SC-55 prospect in the Philippines.

The operator of the Galoc oil field, Galoc Production Company WLL, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Otto. It has commissioned an annual review of remaining oil reserves from RISK, an independent consulting firm.

RISC has reviewed the Galoc oil field reserves in accordance with the SPE, WPC, AAPG and SPEE Petroleum Resource Management System definitions, guidelines and auditing standards.

The reported increases in reserves are attributable to better than expected reservoir performance to date and an extension of field life due to higher prevailing oil prices. The Galoc oil field is expected to remain in production beyond 2020 based on the Galoc Phase I and Phase II well configuration.

"Galoc continues to be a key asset for Otto, delivering valuable cashflow to fund future growth opportunities. I look forward to the delivery of continued reliable production from existing operations and increased production volume from Galoc Phase II in 2H 2013. I am proud of Otto's continued growth as an integrated exploration, development and production company focused on South East Asia and East Africa," Otto's Chief Executive Officer Gregor McNab sai.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here