Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Lebanese Geology Promises Offshore Oil Bonanza

Lebanese Geology Promises Offshore Oil Bonanza

The Levant Basin in the Eastern Mediterranean has already been proven as a hydrocarbon system thanks to major gas discoveries in both Cypriot and Israeli waters. Now the Republic of Lebanon is getting in on the act by opening up its offshore waters to oil and gas explorers.

Lebanon's deepwater area off its coast in the Eastern Mediterranean covers more than 7,600 square miles and offers a variety of unexplored hydrocarbon plays. However, while gas appears to be predominant in the southern part of the Levant Basin, offshore Israel, there is evidence to support the view that there might be plenty of oil resources in the waters of Israel's northern neighbor.

Recently, the Petroleum Administration of the Republic of Lebanon held a seminar to promote pre-qualification for the first ever Lebanese offshore licensing round. Held on March 7 in London, and attended by Rigzone, this was the only formal event planned by the Petroleum Administration ahead of the March 28 deadline for pre-qualification.

Delegates from a variety of oil and gas companies – including majors such as Chevron Corp. and Repsol S.A. – were treated to an exposition on the geology of the region, and got further details from the Petroleum Administration itself on the forthcoming licensing round.

According to one of the presenters, Dr. Neil Hodgson, an exploration geology specialist at seismic imaging firm Spectrum ASA, offshore Lebanon represents an enticing frontier exploration zone.

"It's not many times in your career that you come across a basin that is completely untouched and yet is incredibly prospective," Hodgson said.

"One of the exciting things about this particular basin is that the acreage offshore has never been licensed before. And this is the first chance that the industry has got to discover the wealth and the hydrocarbon promises that lie offshore."

Hodgson pointed out that oil and gas companies who get involved in offshore Lebanon will also benefit from a lot of 3D seismic data that has already been acquired.

"It's very rare that you have 70 percent of a basin covered by 3D seismic before there's even a single license block. That's something very clever that the Lebanese authorities have arranged so that the industry will have 3D seismic when they acquire blocks. So, instead of acquiring seismic before they drill, they can move very, very rapidly into a drilling phase," he said.

One of the key factors that make offshore Lebanon enticing for explorers is that its geology is different to that found elsewhere in the Levant Basin.

While Cyprus and Israel saw giant gas discoveries such as the Aphrodite field (estimated to hold up to nine trillion cubic feet of gas) and Tamar (eight trillion cubic feet), offshore Lebanon promises large oil fields as well as gas.

"The wells that were discovered in the southern Levant Basin discovered dry gas and they discovered dry gas in the early Miocene. But as you come offshore to the north and you go into the Lebanese acreage in the northern Levant Basin the basin gets deeper, the source rocks become more mature and it becomes an oil-prone basin as well as a gas-prone basin," explained Hodgson.

The early Miocene sands in the Levant Basin come from Nile Delta, according to Hodgson. Sands from the early Miocene period were transported long distances to the basement floor and dumped along what is known as the Levant Ramp – a steep change of dip on the basement floor. Channel systems, like gutters, run along the southern Levant Basin, which means the sands have distributed into large fans in the northern Levant Basin.

"And so the mass of sands is in the northern Levant Basin offshore Lebanon, rather than the southern Levant Basin, where the gas discoveries were made. It's quite unusual … but all of these discoveries here [in the southern Levant basin] – Tamar, Leviathan and Aphrodite – have relatively thin reservoirs. They have several hundred meters of reservoirs, which is pretty good, but it's not as good as you are going to find when you go into the northern Levant Basin offshore Lebanon because the reservoir there will be a thousand meters thick. At least three times as thick as you find with the reservoir to the south," Hodgson said.

The source rock offshore Lebanon is mature and buried deep enough for oil generation, Hodgson explained.

"In Tamar, we have biogenic gas – gas produced by biogenic action, not thermally produced … That's because this source rock is not buried deep enough, whereas in the northern Levant Basin it is buried deep enough and there's so many studies now that come together to demonstrate that," Hodgson said.

"From the study that we did, we could see that the source rock under Tamar/Leviathan was not mature, whereas the source rock here in the northern Levant Basin offshore Lebanon is mature and it is mature for the production of oil."

Meanwhile, more evidence for oil plays offshore Lebanon exist in the form of oil seeps that can be seen all the way along the coast of Lebanon. The reason for these seeps running up the coats is a kilometer-thick sequence of salt that no oil can get through.

The oil "migrates up and hits the base of the salt and then wriggles along the base of the salt until it can find a way out. And it finds a way out at the edge of the salt, which is all the way up the coast," Hodgson explained.

One 769-square mile (2,000-square kilometer) area that Spectrum has acquired 2D seismic data over suggests a number of structures that hold up to 20 trillion cubic feet of gas (or their oil equivalent), according an example presented by Hodgson.

After some political infighting within Lebanon, which delayed the original pre-qualification process for international companies that want to get involved in the country's first offshore licensing round, Lebanon has now set a March 28 deadline for pre-qualification. However, that could still be extended by a couple of weeks according to Wissam Zahabi, the head of Lebanese Petroleum Administration's economic and finance department, who also presented at the London seminar.

Three weeks will be taken to assess the license applications before the licensing round officially begins May 2. The round will last six months and close Nov. 4.

The Lebanese government is to opt for a royalty charge rather than have the state itself take part in the licensing round, Zahabi explained.

"There's an option in the law, but we will not have this state participation. We don't have the entity to manage this," Zahabi said. "So there will be no state participation, we will have royalty on gas, which is flat, and royalty on oil which is progressive and related to production. I will not give the figures now."

Meanwhile, Zahabi said that the various license blocks that Lebanon will put up for auction will be revealed soon.

"We have already prepared them," he said. "How many blocks we shall award we don't know. We are still working on our licensing strategy."

Zahabi outlined a few of the terms of the licenses:

The licenses will include an exploration phase of up to 10 years and a production phase that will last up to 30 years.Each exploration block must have at least three companies participating in the license. Firms participating should be joint stock companies.Operators of a license should have total assets of $10 billion and should previously have had operatorship of at least one petroleum development in water depths in excess of 500 meters (1,640 feet).Non-operating participants should have already established petroleum production elsewhere and have at least $500 million of total assets, although joint ventures of companies that have combined assets of more than $500 million will also be acceptable.

Dozens of companies have already expressed interest in Lebanon's first offshore licensing round. The next couple of months will see how many are in the mix for when the country comes to award the licenses in February 2014.

A former engineer, Jon is an award-winning editor who has covered the technology, engineering and energy sectors since the mid-1990s. Email Jon at jmainwaring@rigzone.com.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Faroe Still on Target to Drill 5 Wells in 2013

Faroe Petroleum remains on target to drill five fully-funded exploration wells during the remainder of this year, the company said as it released its annual results Tuesday.

Faroe said its capital expenditure plans for 2013 "will be significant" with it earmarking some GBP 170 million ($258 million) to be spent during the year. GBP 120 million ($182 million) of this will be spent on exploration, with the remainder spent on producing fields.

Four wells are planned in Norway (Darwin, Snilehorn, Novus and Butch East) while one appraisal well is planned in the UK (Perth).

In its results for 2012, Faroe said that its 2P (proved and probable) reserves stood at 20.1 million barrels of oil equivalent at the end of December. 95 percent of this is associated with fields currently on production.

2012 total average production was approximately 6,900 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boepd), compared with 2,500 boepd in 2011.

Faroe noted that the Hyme field came on stream in February this year, with net production from the well during 2013 expected to be approximately 1,200 boepd. In addition, several infill wells are planned for 2013 on the Njord, Brage, Ringhorne East and Schooner fields.

In total, 2013 production is expected to be between 7,000 and 9,000 boepd.

Oil sector analysts at London-based investment bank Peel Hunt commented in a statement:

"Success at the drill bit has been modest with two key discoveries, namely Butch and Rodriguez (post year-end). However, Faroe's growth initiatives have remained robust with its successful participation in the UK (seven awards) and the Norwegian (eight awards) licencing rounds and its entry into Iceland."

A former engineer, Jon is an award-winning editor who has covered the technology, engineering and energy sectors since the mid-1990s. Email Jon at jmainwaring@rigzone.com.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Uganda Govt: Investment in Oil Exploration Hits $1.7B

KAMPALA, Uganda - Investment in oil exploration activities in Uganda's Lake Albertine Rift basin has reached at least $1.7 billion as oil companies continue efforts to determine the exact size of the East African nation's crude reserves, Uganda's energy and minerals ministry said Monday.

In a report, the ministry said that by the end of January 2013, a total of 88 oil exploration and appraisal wells had been drilled in the country, with 76 of them encountering oil. The discoveries represent an impressive success rate of 85% with less than 40% of the oil region explored so far, as Uganda steps up efforts to join the ranks of top oil producers such as Nigeria, Angola and Sudan in Sub-Saharan Africa.

"Cumulative investments made in petroleum exploration in the country since 1998 are estimated to be $1.7 billion... this is expected to increase as the country enters the development and subsequently the production and refining phase of the petroleum value chain," said Kalisa Kabagambe, permanent secretary at the energy and minerals ministry.

Increased discoveries have upgraded the country's crude reserve estimates to 3.5 billion barrels from 2.5 billion barrels last year. However, government and oil companies are still split over the oil development plan and refining options, which continue to push back the planned start of production.

More than a year since Uganda approved U.K.-based Tullow Oil PLC's long-delayed $2.9 billion agreement to split its oil licenses with Total SA and CNOOC Ltd., an oil development plan is yet to be agreed for the basin.

Tullow, Total and CNOOC want to sell crude on the open market and are considering $5 billion of investment in crude pipelines to the East African coast. But Uganda insists that most of the oil should be refined locally, initially for domestic consumption and then for regional export. The three companies are planning to invest at least $12 billion to develop the oil fields.

Copyright (c) 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Wu to Head China's National Energy Administration

BEIJING - China has appointed Wu Xinxiong to lead the National Energy Administration, a listing of management officers at the country's top energy regulator on its website showed Tuesday.

Mr. Wu, the former chairman of the State Electricity Regulatory Commission, replaced Liu Tienan as head of the agency. The website didn't say when Mr. Wu's appointment took effect.

Beijing said earlier this month that it will establish a new energy bureau, and merge the current National Energy Administration and the State Electricity Regulatory Commission as part of a government agency shake-up proposal. The merger is still in process.

Copyright (c) 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

STATS Group in BP Pipeline Isolation Operation

Scottish oilfield services firm STATS Group reported Monday on a pipeline isolation operation it has completed for BP in the North Sea.

The firm said it has isolated a 24-inch oil export line on BP's Marnock ETAP spur line in the central North Sea in order to allow the replacement of a 16-inch valve.

STATS said that it deployed its 24-inch Remote Tecno Plug to isolate a pressure of 60 Bar, providing safe working conditions to allow valve replacement activities.

Steven Byers, STATS Group's isolation services managers, commented in a statement:

"The project was a success and enabled BP to complete maintenance works which were reliant on the plug providing an isolation. The client was happy with our flexible approach and willingness to interact to achieve the best outcome possible during a time critical window."

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Wu to Head China's National Energy Administration

BEIJING - China has appointed Wu Xinxiong to lead the National Energy Administration, a listing of management officers at the country's top energy regulator on its website showed Tuesday.

Mr. Wu, the former chairman of the State Electricity Regulatory Commission, replaced Liu Tienan as head of the agency. The website didn't say when Mr. Wu's appointment took effect.

Beijing said earlier this month that it will establish a new energy bureau, and merge the current National Energy Administration and the State Electricity Regulatory Commission as part of a government agency shake-up proposal. The merger is still in process.

Copyright (c) 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

CEA Offers Remarks Ahead of Lease Sale Hearings

This week, Consumer Energy Alliance (CEA) will participate at public hearings in Tallahassee and Panama City Beach hosted by the federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), which is a division within the U.S. Department of the Interior. BOEM has completed a draft environmental impact statement for two proposed oil and gas lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico's Eastern Planning Area and is seeking public comment on the document.

Lease Sales 225 and 226, scheduled for 2014 and 2016, are part of the Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program:2012-2017 (Five Year Program). The Five Year Program makes all areas with the highest-known resource potential available for oil and gas leasing in order to further reduce America's dependence on overseas oil.

BOEM is holding public hearings to solicit comments on the environmental impact statement from interested citizens and organizations. Comments will be used to prepare the final environmental impact statement for these proposed Eastern Planning Area oil and gas lease sales. Three hearings will be held: on Tuesday, March 26, in Tallahassee at 1:00 p.m. EST at the Hilton Garden Inn, 1330 Blairstone Road; and on Wednesday, March 27, in Panama City Beach at 1:00 p.m. CST and again at 6:00 p.m. CST at the Wyndham Bay Point Resort, 4114 Jan Cooley Drive.

Consumer Energy Alliance-Florida Executive Director Kevin Doyle prepared the following comments for the Tallahassee and Panama City Beach public hearings:

"As an advocate for consumers, CEA supports offshore energy exploration and production in the eastern planning areas of the Gulf of Mexico. While CEA encourages the development of renewable energy resources, we believe that continued and expanded oil and gas exploration and production is vital to maintaining a reliable energy supply for consumers, reducing our dependence on oil imports, and growing the economy. Utilizing all available domestic oil and gas resources will bring energy prices down for all American consumers and businesses – allowing them to save money, grow their businesses, and create jobs. "

In addition to creating jobs, offshore oil and gas development provides substantial government revenue through an expanded tax base and royalty payments. In 2009, offshore oil and gas activity in the Gulf of Mexico generated almost $70 billion of economic value and nearly 400,000 jobs. That same year, the industry provided about $20 billion in revenues to federal, state and local governments through royalties, bonuses and tax collections. According to Wood Mackenzie, oil and natural gas development in the Eastern Gulf of Mexico could create 100,000 new jobs in Florida alone.

In 2012, the United States consumed 18.5 million barrels of petroleum products a day, making the U.S. one of the world’s largest petroleum consumers. The United States consumes more energy from petroleum than from any other energy source. Future Eastern Gulf of Mexico energy exploration and production could add significant domestic supplies to help offset the need for overseas imports. It is important that we allow access now because it will years to explore and develop the energy before it can be delivered to consumers.

The Environmental Impact Statement concludes that any environmental impact from offshore oil and gas development in these proposed areas would be minimal if all existing regulatory requirements are met. In the draft EIS, the BOEM examines the potential impact to water quality, air quality, wetlands, marine life, and coastal barriers, among other areas, and each time concludes that given the type and level of activity anticipated, the local environment will not be adversely affected. The draft EIS notes that myriad advancements in technology, practice and regulation following the 2010 Deepwater Horizon spill will further minimize the potential impact of offshore oil and gas development.

Consumer Energy Alliance encourages the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management to proceed in a way that allows for the greatest economic benefit to American energy consumers. This means significant access to the eastern planning areas of the Gulf of Mexico for safe and responsible energy exploration and production. Thank you again for allowing us to be here today.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

C&BP Calls for State Dept. Investigation into Keystone XL Consultant’s Conflicts of Interest

ERMLetterLetter to Secretary of State John Kerry and State Dept. Deputy Inspector General Harold Geisel

Originally posted on April 9, 2013. 

Yesterday, Checks & Balances Project and 11 environmental, faith-based and public interest organizations called on Secretary of State John Kerry and the State Department Deputy Inspector General Harold Geisel to investigate whether Environmental Resources Management (ERM) hid conflicts of interest which might have excluded it from performing the Keystone XL environmental assessment and how State Department officials failed to flag inconsistencies in ERM’s proposal. Tom Zeller, Senior Writer at The Huffington Post, wrote an article highlighting the letter callings for an investigation.

Early last month, the State Department released a 2,000 page environmental impact study for the Keystone XL pipeline claiming that the pipeline would not have major impact on the environment. But, Environmental Resources Management (ERM), the consulting firm hired to perform the “draft supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS),” has ties to fossil fuel companies with major stakes in the Alberta Tar Sands. This conflict of interest was not accurately disclosed  in ERM’s answers on a State Department questionnaire. Checks & Balances Project considers ERM’s responses in its proposal to be intentionally misleading statements.

Unredacted Documents Uncover Conflicts of Interest
Last week, Mother Jones released unredacted versions of the ERM proposal, showing that three experts “had done consulting work for TransCanada and other oil companies with a stake in the Keystone’s approval.”

The unredacted biographies show that ERM’s employees have an existing relationship with ExxonMobil and worked for TransCanada within the last three years among other companies involved in the Canadian tar sands.

Here’s more from Mother Jones’ Andy Kroll:

“ERM’s second-in-command on the Keystone report, Andrew Bielakowski, had worked on three previous pipeline projects for TransCanada over seven years as an outside consultant. He also consulted on projects for ExxonMobil, BP, and ConocoPhillips, three of the Big Five oil companies that could benefit from the Keystone XL project and increased extraction of heavy crude oil taken from the Canadian tar sands.

Another ERM employee who contributed to State’s Keystone report — and whose prior work history was also redacted — previously worked for Shell Oil; a third worked as a consultant for Koch Gateway Pipeline Company, a subsidiary of Koch Industries. Shell and Koch have a significant financial interest in the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline. ERM itself has worked for Chevron, which has invested in Canadian tar-sands extraction, according to its website.”

When asked about who at the State Department decided to redact ERM’s biographies, a State Department spokesperson said “ERM proposed redactions of some information in the administrative documents that they considered business confidential.” Disclosing past clients may be business confidential information, but from what the biographies show, ERM may have recommended the redactions to hide conflicts of interest from public disclosure.

Problem with ERM Answers on Conflict of Interest Questionnaire 

ERMProposalERM’s Proposal to the State Department

The biographies on ERM’s proposal show that the company has had direct relationships with multiple business entities that could be affected by the proposed work in the past three years.

In the “Organizational Conflict of Interest Questionnaire,” the State Department asks (page 42), “Within the past three years, have you (or your organization) had a direct or indirect relationship (financial, organizational, contractual or otherwise) with any business entity that could be affected in any way by the proposed work?“ ERM’s Project Manager, Steve Koster, checked “No” but appears to have added to the Yes/No questionnaire that, “ERM has no existing contract or working relationship with TransCanada.”

Regardless of the addendum Koster added, he still submitted an incomplete statement when checking “No” to the specific question above. Simply put, the information provided by Mr. Koster was an incomplete statement if one simply reviews the biographies of ERM’s employees for the project.

The State Department Contracting Officer should have flagged this inconsistency when reviewing the staff biographies.  ERM’s answers did not properly reveal in the Yes/No questionnaire that ERM did have a current “direct relationship” with a business enetity that could be affected by the proposed work and a relationship in the past three years with TransCanada, the company building the pipeline.

Koster’s incomplete statement on direct business relationships is not the only odd statement in ERM’s proposal. ERM also answered “No” to the question, “Are you (or your organization) an ‘energy concern?’” which the State Department defines (in part) as: “Any person — (1) significantly engaged in the business of conducting research…related to an activity described in paragraphs (i) through (v).” Paragraph (i) states: “Any person significantly engaged in the business of developing, extracting, producing, refining, transporting by pipeline, converting into synthetic fuel, distributing, or selling minerals for use as an energy source…” ERM as a research firm working for fossil fuel companies is, unequivocally, an energy interest.

So the question must be asked: If ERM is unable to accurately fill out a simple questionnaire regarding conflicts of interest, how can we trust the company to perform an unbiased environmental assessment of a 1,179 mile-long pipeline cutting through the American heartland? And, why did the State Department’s Contracting Officer not flag the inconsistencies in ERM’s Conflict of Interest Questionnaire when reviewing the proposals?

Intentions of State Department and ERM in Question

The Federal Government has strict ethics rules to prevent Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCIs) from impacting the impartiality of government contracts and to prevent hiring contractors who cannot provide independent and unbiased services to the government.

According to a white paper from the Congressional Research Service, before the State Department could choose ERM as the contractor, the “Contracting Officer” had to make an “affirmative determination of responsibility.” All government contractors (including ERM) must be deemed responsible, in part by meeting strict ethics guidelines, known as “collateral requirements.”

According to current collateral requirements, contractors must be found “nonresponsible” when there are unavoidable and unmitigated OCIs. Checks & Balances Project believes that the Contracting Officer should have deemed ERM “nonresponsible” because the company serves as a contractor for major fossil fuel companies that have a stake in the Keystone XL pipeline. If ERM were “nonresponsible”, the company would have been ineligible to perform the environmental impact review of the Keystone XL pipeline.

These potential material incomplete statements on a Federal Government proposal calls into question the integrity of ERM and threatens millions in government contracts.

If ERM were determined to be “nonresponsible” or “excluded” because of these incomplete statements, it could jeopardize ERM’s ability to perform any work for the Federal Government. Again, according to the Congressional Research Service:

“Decisions to exclude are made by agency heads or their designees (above the contracting officer’s level) based upon evidence that contractors have committed certain integrity offenses, including any “offenses indicating a lack of business integrity or honesty that seriously affect the present responsibility of a contractor.””

Certainly these incomplete statements call into question both the independence of ERM and the judgement of the Contracting Officer in making the “affirmative determination of responsibility.” This proposal process should be investigated by the State Department Inspector General to determine if ERM’s statements are cause for exclusion.

Groups Calling for Inspector General Investigation

We believe ERM used multiple material incomplete statements and had clear conflicts of interest as shown in the unredacted documents. So, why was ERM hired by the State Department?

Checks & Balances Project asked a State Department spokesperson about the conflicts of interest and the spokesperson said: “Based on a thorough consideration of all of the information presented, including the work histories of team members, the Department concluded that ERM has no financial or other interest in the outcome of the project that would constitute a conflict of interest.” Perhaps the State Department’s Contracting Offier made the decision to hire ERM because of the company’s incomplete statements on the conflict of interest questionnaire.

Harold Geisel, Deputy Inspector General, U.S. State Department

Checks & Balances Project along with 11 other groups (Better Future Project, Center for Biological Diversity, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, DeSmogBlog, Forecast the Facts, Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, NC WARN, Oil Change International, Public Citizen’s Energy Program and Unitarian Universalist Ministry for Earth) sent a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry and the State Department Deputy Inspector General Harold Geisel calling for an investigation into the matter. These incomplete statements and the determination by the Contracting Officer that ERM did not have any conflicts of interest, despite clear evidence to the contrary, are grounds for further investigation.


View the original article here

Perupetro Plans Auction for Offshore Concessions

Perupetro Plans Auction for Offshore Concessions

LIMA, Peru - Peru's state agency for hydrocarbon exploration, Perupetro, said Monday it plans to auction off nine concessions in the fourth quarter of this year.

Perupetro President Luis Ortigas said all of the nine concessions are offshore. He said the concessions should attract investments of $450 million.

Mr. Ortigas said Perupetro will start a roadshow in the coming weeks to promote the auction.

He said investments in offshore concessions totaled about $2 billion in recent years, and he expects these investments to double in the next five years.

Perupetro had previously said it planned to auction off more than 30 concessions this year, with most of those concessions located in Peru's Amazon region. However, that plan has been delayed several times as the agency awaits information needed to carry out prior consultation for indigenous groups living in the Amazon.

Copyright (c) 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Aker Awarded Moho Nord Contract Offshore Congo

Norwegian oilfield services firm Aker Solutions has won an $850 million contract from Total to deliver a subsea production system for the Moho Nord project in the Republic of Congo, the company reported Monday.

The Moho Nord project, which is located approximately 47 miles off the coast of Congo, consists of two developments: Moho Nord and Moho Bilondo 1bis. Aker and Total will run both developments as a single, integrated project.

Aker said the scope of the work included the delivery of 28 vertical subsea trees, including wellhead systems, two installation and workover control systems, seven manifold structures, subsea control and tie-in systems. The project will use Aker's new vertical tree technology, the firm added.

Management, engineering and procurement will mainly be performed at Aker's headquarters in Fornebu, Norway. The subsea trees and worker systems will be manufactured at the Tranby manufacturing center outside Oslo, while the production of manifolds will be carried out at the firm's facility in Egersund, Norway, and Aker's Aberdeen facility will deliver the control systems and the wellheads.

Alan Brunnen, head of Aker's subsea business area, commented in a statement:

"This is a major contract award for Aker Solutions. We are investing and growing internationally and Aker Solutions is committed to developing the oil and gas industry in the Republic of the Congo through knowledge sharing and local content."

Moho Nord and Moho Bilondo 1bis are part of the Moho-Bilondo oil field which was commissioned in April 2008 for commercial production. It is the first deepwater offshore field of the Republic of the Congo at water depths ranging between 1,970 and 3,445 feet.

Post a Comment Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Kuwait Minister: US Shale Oil Bonanza is No Threat

Kuwait Minister: US Shale Oil Bonanza is No Threat

DUBAI - Growing production from U.S. shale deposits is not a threat to Kuwait due to its higher costs, the country's oil minister Hani Hussein said in remarks published late Monday.

"There is no effect on Gulf crudes from shale oil in the United States as it will take a long time for this crude to have an impact because of its high cost," Mr. Hussein said, according to the official Kuwait News Agency, or KUNA.

"Gulf countries have huge reserves that can be produced at simple costs," he added.

Analysts have previously said that producing oil from U.S. shale is estimated to cost around $50-75 a barrel, while in the Gulf production costs are often less than $20.

Earlier this month, Sami al-Rushaid, the chairman and managing director of state-owned Kuwait Oil Co., said that shale production may lead to a fall in crude oil prices as it cuts into demand, but that prices are likely to stay at about $100 a barrel.

Kuwait, an Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries member, has previously said it has begun a study to assess its shale-oil deposits.

In November, the International Energy Agency, which represents key oil consumers, predicted the U.S. would overtake Saudi Arabia as the world's largest oil producer by 2020 thanks to shale output, a forecast which the OPEC secretary general said could undermine its members' spending plans.

OPEC said Tuesday that demand for its members' oil in 2013 will be 100,000 barrels a day lower than previously forecast, as growing output from non-member countries, particularly North American shale oil, eats into its market share.

If the scaled-back forecast proves correct, OPEC could be on track to have its lowest share of the global oil market in more than 10 years. OPEC's move comes as industry experts question whether the producers' group, which has had a decisive influence on the oil market since the 1970s, can maintain its position amid a boom in U.S. oil production resulting from shale-rock drilling technology.

Copyright (c) 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here

Total Reports Unplanned Outage at Scottish Gas Terminal

Total E&P UK tweeted early Tuesday that it has suffered an unplanned outage at its St Fergus gas terminal north of Aberdeen, Scotland. The firm's Twitter account reported that the outage means that it is losing the equivalent of five million cubic meters (177 million cubic feet) of gas per day.

The St Fergus gas terminal is a set of four gas processing plants that receive approximately 20 percent of the UK's gas from several gas fields in the North Sea.

The news comes just two weeks after Total restarted production at its Elgin/Franklin platform after it had been out of action for almost a year following a major gas leak there on March 25, 2012.

A former engineer, Jon is an award-winning editor who has covered the technology, engineering and energy sectors since the mid-1990s. Email Jon at jmainwaring@rigzone.com.

Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

View the original article here