Posts
Log in / Register
Text SizeHOMEEar to the GroundLarry's ListPolitics TodayAll Ear to the groundColumnsBill BoyarskyJuan ColeMarcia Alesan DawkinsAmy GoodmanChris HedgesRobert ScheerRichard SchickelCol. Ann WrightTruthdigger of the WeekMoreCartoonsMr. Fish CartoonsAll CartoonsArts & CultureAuthor InterviewBook ExcerptsBook ReviewsEssaysFilm ReviewsTheater ReviewsDigsShopTruthdig MerchandiseTruthdig BooksAuthor BooksRobert Scheer BooksChris Hedges BooksMr. Fish T-shirtsMr. Fish PrintsMultimediaA/V BoothTruthdig RadioPhoto EssaysPodcastsQ&A: Live ChatsAdvertiseDonateAboutdiv#src_container {width: 175px;background: #b59d91;height: 24px;padding: 5px;display: block;float: right;margin-top: 6px;z-index: 2;}#src_container input {width: 137px;height: 23px;border: 1px solid #5b5b5b;padding: 5px;}input#src_btn_raquo {width: 30px;height: 24px;background-color: #6f4434;color: #fff;border: none;}>" id="src_btn_raquo">Trending: bradley manning chris hedges education israel jon stewart
NASA Announces World Won't End Dec. 21, 2012The Shameful Exploitation of Bradley Manning
Senator Demands Federal Pot Plan, Norquist Makes Insane Prediction, and More
Court: CIA Tortured Wrongly Detained Terror Suspect
The Trials of Bradley Manning
The Answer Is Blowing in the WindThe Shameful Exploitation of Bradley Manning
Homeownership Support Shouldn’t Be a Mansion Subsidy
Wonderland on a Cliff
Scrooge
The Shameful Exploitation of Bradley ManningBy Robert Scheer
Wonderland on a CliffBy Eugene Robinson
Homeownership Support Shouldn’t Be a Mansion SubsidyBy David Sirota
Why the Fed’s Jobs Program Will FailBy Robert Reich
Court: CIA Tortured Wrongly Detained Terror Suspect Senator Demands Federal Pot Plan, Norquist Makes Insane Prediction, and More Susan Rice Withdraws From Secretary of State Consideration Death Star Petition Meets White House Goal A Growing Water Deficit in the West The Internet Turf War
NASA Announces World Won’t End Dec. 21, 2012 Sarah Silverman Pro-Choice Video Tells ‘Bros’ to Stand Up for the Ladies Watch: Fox News Contributor Gets Punched in Face During Union Protest The Revolution Continues in Challenge to Morsi
Regulate Dissent in Hong Kong, Jackie Chan SaysFighting Manifest Destiny
By Jonathan Yardley Glenn Greenwald Condemns ‘Zero Dark Thirty’ Torture Porn
Psy Shames Himself With Unqualified Apology (Video)
By Alexander Reed Kelly
The Questions Education Reformers Aren’t AskingDig led by Mike Rose Gore Vidal: His Life and Legacy
Dig led by Truthdig Staff
advertisement-->
Norman Podhoretz: A Biographyadvertisement
-->
Breaking the Sound BarrierBy Amy Goodman
$10.80
advertisement
-->
White T-Shirt$18
Homeownership Support Shouldn’t Be a Mansion Subsidy 
Email 
Print 
ShareTweet
Posted on Dec 13, 2012 By David Sirota
With Congress finally starting to have a serious conversation about our revenue crisis, there are obvious reasons to limit the amount of mortgage interest that Americans can deduct from their taxable income.
First and foremost, current law—which allows homeowners to deduct all interest on mortgages up to $1 million—is extremely expensive for the country. As federal data show, it costs roughly $100 billion a year, making it the third largest expenditure woven into the tax code. As federal data show, it costs roughly $100 billion a year, making it the third largest expenditure woven into the tax code.
That huge outlay might be justified if the deduction was a widely-distributed, middle-class program. But with only about a third of all taxpayers earning enough to make it worthwhile to itemize their tax returns, just a quarter of all tax filers ever actually utilize the deduction. Add to this the fact that the deduction can be used for second homes, and the result is a write-off that mostly benefits the wealthy. In dollar-figure terms, it is a deduction that, according to the Tax Policy Center, saves $5460 for someone making more than $250,000 a year and only $91 for those making less than $40,000 a year.
As compelling as these facts are, though, the best argument for changing the deduction comes from recounting an obvious—but taboo—truth. Put simply, even in the name of the national goal of homeownership, the tax code does not need to subsidize $1 million mortgages, because nobody requires that large a mortgage to afford an adequate home.
The typical rejoinder to this truism is an argument citing disparities in real estate markets. The idea is that there are geographic variations in the price of decent housing, and that while a $1 million mortgage might buy a mansion in Omaha or Toledo, it supposedly doesn’t buy enough in places like Manhattan and La Jolla. Therefore, the logic goes, the tax code should be fully subsidizing such outsized mortgages to make sure those living in posh enclaves aren’t left out of the homeownership drive.
Advertisement
Sure, you may want to live on New York City’s Upper West Side or Southern California’s coastal bluffs, and if you have the cash to do so, go right ahead. However, you don’t so desperately need to live there that taxpayers should be fully subsidizing your home loan.
This is true, by the way, even if your job is in one those expensive locales—after all, in nearly every major population center there are plenty of great homes that cost less than $1 million. They just require a bit more of a commute to the office. Again, you may not want that commute and if you are wealthy enough, you don’t have to have one. But you don’t need something more convenient than what less than $1 million can buy you in any real estate market - at least not to the point of justifying a tax loophole.
This is the basic—if unstated—principle behind a key initiative from President Obama’s National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. The bipartisan group proposes to limit the deduction to mortgage principal of $500,000 or less. Though some rich people will inevitably react to the concept with shrieks of “class warfare,” the new write-off could be structured to still give them a deduction on the first half million dollars of their jumbo loans.
If America somehow believes such a commonsense initiative represents a class war and the proposal is consequently blocked in Congress, then it would mean there is no war at all. It would mean the rich have already won.
It would also mean there’s little chance to solve our fiscal problems, because if such a modest proposal can be defeated, then even bigger budget reforms probably have no chance whatsoever.
David Sirota is a best-selling author of the book “Back to Our Future: How the 1980s Explain the World We Live In Now.” He co-hosts “The Rundown” on AM630 KHOW in Colorado. Email him at ds@davidsirota.com, follow him on Twitter @davidsirota or visit his website at www.davidsirota.com.
© 2012 CREATORS.COM
TAGS: 2012 congress david sirota housing mortgage politics real estate subsidies taxes
Related Entries
Wonderland on a Cliff
Senator Demands Federal Pot Plan, Norquist Makes Insane Prediction, and More
NASA Announces World Won’t End Dec. 21, 2012 Which Path for the Right? 
Email to a friend Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.
Next item: The Shameful Exploitation of Bradley Manning
New and Improved Comments
If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Get Truthdig in your inbox
Newsletter
Become a Fan
Follow Us
Subscribe
CloseGive the gift of independent journalism.
Support Truthdig by making a donation of at least $25 in someone's name, and we'll send him or her a signed letter of appreciation from our publisher.
With your support, we've been able to pay writers such as Chris Hedges, Col. Ann Wright, Mr. Fish and Nomi Prins.
We've sent reporters around the world, from Afghanistan to Cairo to Cuba.
Thanks to you, our mission to find and publish a range of insightful opinion and analysis from a progressive point of view continues.
Support Truthdig
HOME|Digs|Reports|Arts & Culture|Uncovered|Ear to the Ground|A/V Booth|CartoonsTags|Bazaar|Podcast|About Us|Contact Us|User Agreement|Privacy Policy|FAQ: Comments and Moderation | Google+ Google+
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.© 2012 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved. Web site development by Hop Studios
View the Original article
0 comments:
Post a Comment