Monday, December 24, 2012

The Final Battle


Romney the Reluctant Presidential Candidate, Another Kennedy Weighs Senate Run, and More

Truthdigger of the Week: Zack Kopplin

Koch Brother’s Next Target: Hurricane Sandy Victims

More Bad News for Boehner

Most CommentsMost Emailed Where You Going Joe With That Gun in Your Hand?

Life and Death

Leader of Revolution

Daniel Berrigan

Super


Reports * NEW! *
By Chris Hedges * NEW! * How Dark Money Helped Republicans Hold the House
By Olga Pierce, Justin Elliott and Theodoric Meyer, ProPublica Where Are We Heading—Bedford Falls or Pottersville?
By Robert Reich Truthdigger of the Week: Zack Kopplin
By Alexander Reed Kelly
Ear to the Ground * NEW! * Pirates Beware: The U.K. Is Handing Over Your Loot * NEW! * GOP Senator Who Says He Doesn’t Drink Is Charged With DUI * NEW! * Romney the Reluctant Presidential Candidate, Another Kennedy Weighs Senate Run, and More * NEW! * Koch Brother’s Next Target: Hurricane Sandy Victims More Bad News for Boehner Underwater Landslide Could Trigger Australian Tsunami
A/V Booth * NEW! * ‘Call Me Crazy,’ NRA Chief Says of Controversial New Gun Proposal Debunking NRA Power, Apocalyptic Myths and the Fiscal Cliff ‘Left, Right & Center:’ Guns and the Naked Fiscal Cliff Happy Holidays From Truthdig
Arts & Culture We Value Belonging More Than Privacy
A Simple, Excellent and Surprising Film
By Richard Schickel A World Without Words
By Lauren B. Davis Hollywood’s Raid on Convention
By Richard Schickel
Digs The Questions Education Reformers Aren’t Asking
Dig led by Mike Rose

Gore Vidal: His Life and Legacy
Dig led by Truthdig Staff


Truthdig Bazaaradvertisement

--> For the Soul of Mankind
For the Soul of MankindBy Melvyn P. Leffler
$13.60

advertisement

--> Iraq: A War
Iraq: A WarChris Hedges
$20.00

advertisement

-->
White T-Shirt$18

more items
 Reports Chris Hedges' Columns Email this item Email    Print this item Print   Share this item... Share

Tweet Posted on Dec 23, 2012 AP/Alex Brandon, File

By Chris Hedges

Over the past year I and other plaintiffs including Noam Chomsky and Daniel Ellsberg have pressed a lawsuit in the federal courts to nullify Section 1021(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). This egregious section, which permits the government to use the military to detain U.S. citizens, strip them of due process and hold them indefinitely in military detention centers, could have been easily fixed by Congress. The Senate and House had the opportunity this month to include in the 2013 version of the NDAA an unequivocal statement that all U.S. citizens would be exempt from 1021(b)(2), leaving the section to apply only to foreigners. But restoring due process for citizens was something the Republicans and the Democrats, along with the White House, refused to do. The fate of some of our most basic and important rights—ones enshrined in the Bill of Rights as well as the Fourth and Fifth amendments of the Constitution—will be decided in the next few months in the courts. If the courts fail us, a gulag state will be cemented into place. 

Sens. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and Mike Lee, R-Utah, pushed through the Senate an amendment to the 2013 version of the NDAA. The amendment, although deeply flawed, at least made a symbolic attempt to restore the right to due process and trial by jury. A House-Senate conference committee led by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., however, removed the amendment from the bill last week.

“I was saddened and disappointed that we could not take a step forward to ensure at the very least American citizens and legal residents could not be held in detention without charge or trial,” Feinstein said in a statement issued by her office. “To me that was a no-brainer.”

The House approved the $633 billion NDAA for 2013 in a 315-107 vote late Thursday night. It will now go before the Senate. Several opponents of the NDAA in the House, including Rep. Morgan Griffith, R-Va., cited Congress’ refusal to guarantee due process and trial by jury to all citizens as his reason for voting against the bill. He wrote in a statement after the vote that “American citizens may fear being arrested and indefinitely detained by the military without knowing what they have done wrong.”

The Feinstein-Lee amendment was woefully adequate. It was probably proposed mainly for its public relations value, but nonetheless it resisted the concerted assault on our rights and sought to calm nervous voters objecting to the destruction of the rule of law. The amendment failed to emphatically state that citizens could never be placed in military custody. Rather, it said citizens could not be placed in indefinite military custody without “trial.” But this could have been a trial by military tribunals. Citizens, under the amendment, could have been barred from receiving due process in a civil court. Still, it was better than nothing. And now we have nothing.

Advertisement

“Congressional moves concerning the NDAA make it clear that Congress as a whole has no stomach for the protection of civil liberties,” said attorney Bruce Afran, who along with attorney Carl Mayer has brought the lawsuit against President Obama in which we are attempting to block Section 1021(b)(2).

The only hero so far in this story is U.S. District Judge Katherine B. Forrest of the Southern District Court of New York. Forrest in September accepted all of our challenges to the law. She issued a permanent injunction invalidating Section 1021(b)(2). Government lawyers asked Forrest for a “stay pending appeal”—meaning the law would go back into effect until the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a ruling in the case. She refused. The government then went directly to the Court of Appeals and asked it for a temporary stay while promising not to detain the plaintiffs or other U.S. citizens under the provision. The Court of Appeals, which will hear oral arguments in January, granted the government’s request for a temporary stay. The law went back into effect. If the Court of Appeals upholds Forrest’s ruling, the case will most likely be before the Supreme Court within weeks.

“President Obama should never have appealed this watershed civil rights ruling,” Mayer said. “But now that he has, the fight may well go all the way to the Supreme Court. At stake is whether America will slide more toward authoritarianism or whether the judicial branch of government will stem the decade-long erosion of our civil liberties. Since 9/11 Americans have been systematically stripped of their freedoms: Their phone calls are monitored under [George W.] Bush and Obama’s warrantless wiretapping program, they are videotaped relentlessly in public places, there are drones over American soil and the police control protesters and dissenters with paramilitary gear and tactics. As long as Obama and the leadership of both parties want the military to police our streets, we will fight. This is unacceptable, un-American and unconstitutional.”

1   2   NEXT PAGE >>>The World As It Is:
Dispatches on the Myth of Human Progress

A collection of Truthdig Columns
by Chris HedgesKeep up with Chris Hedges’ latest columns, interviews, tour dates and more at www.truthdig.com/chris_hedges.

TAGS: barack obama congress courts daniel ellsberg dianne feinstein indefinite detention katherine forrest mike lee military national defense authorization act ndaa ndaa lawsuit noam chomsky politics



Related EntriesRomney the Reluctant Presidential Candidate, Another Kennedy Weighs Senate Run, and More Romney the Reluctant Presidential Candidate, Another Kennedy Weighs Senate Run, and More What Americans Should Learn From the ‘Republican Apocalypse’The Mideast Surprise of 2013? The Mideast Surprise of 2013?Gingrich Switches on Gay Marriage, Limbaugh ‘Honored’ for Lies, and More Gingrich Switches on Gay Marriage, Limbaugh ‘Honored’ for Lies, and More SHARE THIS ARTICLE:

Email to a friend

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

Previous item: How Dark Money Helped Republicans Hold the House



New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.NewsletterGet Truthdig in your inbox


Follow Truthdig

Newsletter Sign-upNewsletter

Become a Fan of Truthdig on Facebook Become a Fan

Follow Truthdig on Twitter Follow Us

Subscribe to Truthdig RSS Feeds Subscribe

     Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
       #donation_div {display:none;}.popup {background:#FFF; border:1px solid #333; padding:1px;}.popup-header {height:65px; padding: 30px 40px 10px 50px;}.popup-header h2 {margin:0; padding:0; font-size:18px; float:left;}.popup-header .close-link {float:right; font-size:11px;}.popup-body {padding: 20px 70px 20px 50px;}a {color: #990000;}LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Close

Give the gift of independent journalism.

Support Truthdig by making a donation of at least $25 in someone's name, and we'll send him or her a signed letter of appreciation from our publisher.

With your support, we've been able to pay writers such as Chris Hedges, Col. Ann Wright, Mr. Fish and Nomi Prins.

We've sent reporters around the world, from Afghanistan to Cairo to Cuba.

Thanks to you, our mission to find and publish a range of insightful opinion and analysis from a progressive point of view continues.

Support Truthdig

HOME|Digs|Reports|Arts & Culture|Uncovered|Ear to the Ground|A/V Booth|Cartoons
Tags|Bazaar|Podcast|About Us|Contact Us|User Agreement|Privacy Policy|FAQ: Comments and Moderation | Google+ Google+
FeedList A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2012 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved. Web site development by Hop Studiosfree hit countersQuantcast 

View the Original article

0 comments:

Post a Comment